Talk:Bill & Ted
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Bill & Ted.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Article policies
|
Brogo's musings[edit source]
@MrX:
Meanwhile ... --Brogo13 (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Isn't this like, the 11th time someone has to tell you that we don't need to follow Wikipedia's manual of style?
- No, you don't have to tell me (lookie here), nor have I ever asked anyone here to follow thus. Please (for the umpteenth time) just accept the fact that I do β altruistically. --Brogo13 (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Brogo13: your smugness contradicts your assertion that your actions are purely altruistic, don't you think? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 22:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think not. And don't call me Purely. --Brogo13 (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Brogo, smh, you indeed have asked (not sure if asked is the right, but whatever) Uncyclopedians to follow Wikipedia's manual of style, many times, and I often agree with you about that. Also, I'm not sure what you're asking me with a diff of someone else's edit. MrX 10:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @MrX: I think I should add that Brogo may have asked to follow Wikipedia's manual of style, but many of his own edits don't follow Wikipedia's MoS in the slightest (such as weird "easter eggs" that don't really follow the theme of the article, or frameless images, which I have barely seen on Wikipedia). Also, I'm entitled to say that this discussion should probably not be in this talkpage, as this has nothing to do with Bill and Ted (that is also something Brogo does a lot; making talkpages solely to ask the admins why an edit of his got reverted). πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 10:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- That's true he often breaks from Wikipedia's mos for reasons that seem odd to me. Also it's fine that this discussion is here. Slightly off topic but it's not like we're spamming a user talk page. MrX 11:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Meanwhile ... --Brogo13 (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- That's true he often breaks from Wikipedia's mos for reasons that seem odd to me. Also it's fine that this discussion is here. Slightly off topic but it's not like we're spamming a user talk page. MrX 11:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- @MrX: I think I should add that Brogo may have asked to follow Wikipedia's manual of style, but many of his own edits don't follow Wikipedia's MoS in the slightest (such as weird "easter eggs" that don't really follow the theme of the article, or frameless images, which I have barely seen on Wikipedia). Also, I'm entitled to say that this discussion should probably not be in this talkpage, as this has nothing to do with Bill and Ted (that is also something Brogo does a lot; making talkpages solely to ask the admins why an edit of his got reverted). πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 10:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Brogo, smh, you indeed have asked (not sure if asked is the right, but whatever) Uncyclopedians to follow Wikipedia's manual of style, many times, and I often agree with you about that. Also, I'm not sure what you're asking me with a diff of someone else's edit. MrX 10:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think not. And don't call me Purely. --Brogo13 (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Brogo13: your smugness contradicts your assertion that your actions are purely altruistic, don't you think? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 22:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
19:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- No, you don't have to tell me (lookie here), nor have I ever asked anyone here to follow thus. Please (for the umpteenth time) just accept the fact that I do β altruistically. --Brogo13 (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)