Talk:Arequipa, Peru

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review[edit source]

Any comments on how to improve it? Any ways to make it funnier? Any ideas?

Humour: 7 A little immature at times, could be expanded upon.
Concept: 4 Very obscure . . . I read the title and thought, "Huh?"
Prose and formatting: 7 Actually, not very bad. Could be a tad bit more professional...it adds humor. :)
Images: 9 Very good, no cheesy obviously photoshopped junk.
Miscellaneous: 5 Since when is Borat Hispanic? And what's with all the birdshit?
Final Score: 32 Well, it's obviously a work in progress. I think it has potential, though!
Reviewer: Vanaelin 00:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


Too much "shit" for define Arequipa. Looks like somebody from "Lema" wrote that ;)

You WHAT???[edit source]

You tried to get this article through Pee Review? Well, okay, and it's still here. I have taken over defense of the articles on Peru and Lima, so everyone who contributes without a user name at least keeps it funny. You obviously have a theme here--that everything about Arequipa equals shit--and I'm not going to touch it. But that's obviously what your reviewer meant by "A little immature." In the article on Peru I wrote that maybe the "White City" means guano and maybe it means gringos. Then I send them to you.

Anyway, I've been to Peru six times, as far in as Pucallpa and spent months up in Chiclayo but never went further south than Paracas. But maybe someday we'll work together on this page. Spıke ¬  01:44 5-Dec-09


Some day is now, as Anon just pointed out that the theme of the article (other than shit) (chicha) has nothing to do with Arequipa and is produced way to the north. Anon goes on to call the humor "stereotypical," proving that this is the first Uncyclopedia page he has ever read. Separately, referring to a country or a subdivision as a "People's Republic" is generally accepted as trite, no matter what you think of its government. If any readers are actually IN the White City, I would be grateful for suggestions of current events that could be described with humor. Spıke ¬ 12:23 20-May-12

huh[edit source]

If some day i have time for it i'll rewrite this article. At now this article is... strange? I dunno but i didn't even smiled, sorry (Inciclopedia's version is a lot better). As I said, if i have time here i'll rewrite it (if that's legal here). Nadienator4000010 (talk) 03:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

That’s very legal here. Let me know if you’d like any help with it. Cheers. MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 03:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Great then, I think i'll start this weekend. And yea, it could be helpful having other hand on the proyect :) --Nadienator4000010 (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Cool. MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 03:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)