Talk:Allah/Annotated version

I hate to say it, but I think this version is actually funnier than the regular version. At least, the fact that you needed an annotated version makes me laugh. Because I laugh at ignorant people. I also kick kittens. I'm a bad person.

Agreed!! 87.217.104.81 20:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Anyway, the "forced to explain away all my nice satire, good going morons" tone of the article is quite refreshing. I hope that some idiot, somewhere learns something from this. But did you mean to linkify all the words? I'd warn against it, if only because you'll end up with said morons clicking the red links and making dumb-ass articles, thus un-redifying them. You might want <font color=red> or somesuch instead. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 03:07, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Erk, didn't consider that! I put the brackets there at first to separate the "notes" from the text, then I figured that the glaring red was a good way to be subtle about it. I'll fix it now.--Jordanus 04:13, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Whoever said explaining a joke couldn't make it even funnier clearly never read this article. Kudos. This is top notch. --Isra1337 06:46, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

WOW. Uncyclopedia goes whole new level with this article: explaining joke can be funny as joke itself. Congrats, you made my day! And yes, need to have annotated version is fucking hilarious itself. --MaDeR 11:59, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, it's so funny that I'm falling down dead. Where are all the parodies of Islam here? I guess you're scared of having your heads chopped off, aren't you? Scaredy-cat, scaredy-cat! Beezwax 18:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't want to seem whiny here but..

"NOTE: THE PRECEDING SECTION IS A DIRECT PARODY OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH. CATHOLICS HAVE A TENDENCY TO PUT THE VIRGIN MARY ON A LEVEL WITH JESUS HIMSELF, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS NOT CALLED FOR IN THE BIBLE. THE FACT THAT THE NARRATOR MAKES THESE SAME ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MUSLIMS - AND THEN ASSUMES THAT CHRISTIANS DO NOT DO THIS - IS HIGHLY IRONIC---" This is untrue. We DO NOT worship Mary. We revere her, REVERE\==\worship. Great annotation otherwise though.-- Anonymous– Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.37.54 (talk • contribs)

You're an Idiot.--58.104.81.209 09:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Well said.

It looks like we need another annotated version for this article. An explanation for the explanations in red perhaps? An annotated version of the annotated version? LOLZ. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 11:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Protestants are idiots. They hate Catholics so much they can't see past their own errors. - {{User:Impact_Segment}}

No, Protestants are NOT idiots. You're an idiot. Following the Bible literally is NOT an error. Taking God's word for it when he says that works cannot save you, like Catholics think, is NOT an error. Or is not buying indulgences an error? 4.158.192.42 12:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hows this, Protestants and Catholics are idiots. Look how they spend their whole Sunday. Flyberius 16:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I think an annotated version of the discussion tab is needed too. LOLZ. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 11:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This page needs to be undated

I thnik.--58.104.81.209 09:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanx alot

God bless you brother

Yeah, and may you be rich and content in this life, 'cause you won't be in the next if you keep up this crap! Beezwax 18:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

---THIS ARTICLE IS ABSOLUTE CRAP---

---LISTEN UP, YOU ASSHOLES. I DON'T KNOW WHAT GETS INTO YOUR BLASTED HEADS, BUT THIS IS ALL WRONG. THE MUSLIMS, NOT THE EUROPEANS, WERE BRUTAL. THEY MURDERED AND TORTURED CHRISTIANS FOR NOT CONFORMING TO THEIR BLASTED VIEWS, BUT YOU DON'T MENTION THAT! WE JUST TRIED TO TAKE OUR CAPITAL BACK! THIS ARTICLE IS FULL OF MISQUOTES AND MISINTERPRETATIONS AND IS NOT ONE BIT FUNNY. IT IS STUPID. WHERE ARE ALL THE ARTICLES WRITTEN FROM A BIASED MUSLIM POINT OF VIEW (THIS IS OBVIOUSLY ONE) FOR SATIRICAL PURPOSES? FOR INSTANCE, "CHRISTIANITY IS A HORRIBLE, HATEFUL VIOLENT RELIGION THAT BELIEVES IN A TERRIBLE, RAGING GOD THAT WANTS TO DESTROY THE UNIVERSE" WHERE ARE ARTICLES LIKE THAT? NO, EVERY SINGLE BLASTED ONE OF THEM MAKES FUN OF CHRISTIANITY. THERE'S A MONOPOLY OF ANTI-CREATIONIST ARTICLES. STOP WRITING THIS CRAP AND WRITE SOMETHING THAT MAKES FUN OF SOME OTHER RELIGION. THAT IS ALL---

I know you'll probably ignore this and dismiss it all as prejudice, and accuse me of having no sense of humor, but guess what I don't have to share your exact sense of humor in order to be funny. And misrepresentations of Christianity is not funny. So stop Beezwax 18:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm soo sorry for offending you, please don't chop off my head

"Religion of Peace" lol

Oh, I'm so scared! I'm going to have my head ripped off by saying bad things about christianity. Honestly, control yourself. I think the article about agnostics is offensive and do I shout saying "ÎTS NOT FUNNY!!!" ? No

not funny

like the unannotated version, this is TOTALLY NOT FUNNY, and politically incorrect. GET RID OF IT NOW!

How about no, because Uncyclopedia is supposed to be funny to all. And I found this funny but was not amused by then unannotated one. So shut up you big hairy gay grue.

Funnier than the Allah (regular) version, shoulda read that before putting my Anti- Xenophobic comment in the just Allah version...dammit I just wasted 15 minutes of writing for nothing except promoting peace. X_X

What I find funny is how you pigheaded evolutionists will accept Allah's existence, but not God's! How is Allah more appealing than God? Or are you just looking for ways to offend Christians just as much as you can, because you've convinced yourself through heavy ranting that God does not exist and Christians are evil and Muslims are nice, benevolent little puppies?? LOL! 4.158.192.42 12:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

This article in no way accepts Allah's existence. It merely mocks the people (mostly fundamentalist Christians) who hate on Islam while knowing next to nothing about it. It also points out many characteristics the two faiths share -- a similarity that the "author" is far too ignorant to notice. --Jordanus 01:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

There has GOT to be a way to work that bit into the article somehow. It's brilliant. Sometimes, Christians themselves are their own best satirists. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Needs to be updated

Umm, the Allah page has been modified since its annotated version was created. Example: "false, non-Christian gods that plagues the world today. This particular "god" is the figurehead of the Islamism cult, which is such a hideous perversion of good old-fashioned all-American Christian values that it barely deserves mention here"

was changed into

"delusions caused by religion, a disease often leading infected individuals to blow themselves up. It is derived from the Arabic words Al = The, and Lah = Lie, which in turn gives us the phrase "The Lie." "

, and the annotated page still stayed the same. This is not Allah: The Annotated Version: Archived edition ! This needs to be updated, but I don't really know much. Sorry if it seems forceful, but I don't want this necessarily to keep up with EVERY SINGLE EDIT. I just want a little update.

User:Greencat Quarktalk I am Agent Bruno-86

--Greencat Quark (talk) 11:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)