Fuck Uncyclopedia
FUCK UNCYCLOPEDIA NOW! That's right, I said it.
JUST FUCK IT WHILE U CAN![edit | edit source]
“I would like to.”
“I did not!”
“Made my penis shrivel.”
 | It is a violation of federal, state, and/or international law to view this article. Thus, YOU MAY NOT VIEW THIS ARTICLE. Violators will be punished with instant decapitation and a $20,000 fine. |
|
Fuck Uncyclopedia (file info) |
| Uncyclopedia has an audio version of this article. |
|
|
Fuck Uncyclopedia (file info) |
| This is the MP3 version of the article |
CUNTCYCLOPEDIA[edit | edit source]
It's full of semi drunk fuck lightning, transporting chaffe wagons carrying a bunch of cock wallet, tit hockey, knife sack jacking, weaboo sperm.
History[edit | edit source]
Many people have said that it is possible to have sex with Uncyclopedia. Quite often on the forum page people have posted the words Fuck and Uncyclopedia together. These people claim it is possible to have sex with Uncyclopedia. Some even believe that after having sex with the Uncyclopedia, Oscar Wilde created all life on the planet and civilzation as we know it, but then these some may have also been huffing orange kittens.
Examples[edit | edit source]
You fucking shits took away my record senetence that i put some time into. IT WAS A FUCKING RECORD and you took it from the earth. You bitches.. --Readmesoon 20:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC) 12:59, 13 June 2008
I worked for a reasonable amount of time to improve an article and you huffed it without slapping an an nrv tag first. -- Mr. Angrypants 12:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Clearly this person is asking to have sex with one of the admins. Apparently he claims the admin was huffing in anticipation of having sex with him over the article he wrote. He claims that he wanted his article slapped first with an nrv tag, showing that he wanted freaky and kinky sex.
Well, I don't have a saved copy of my article, nevermind I guess
- Fuck you as well. Tommy Gun 22:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 22:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but you "worked hard on it"? If that above link goes to the right page, then FUCK YOU TWICE OVER I fucking worked hard on this thing that got deleted by some bitter admin, and now it only remains as a remnant on some poor sympathetic user's space. What I saw on Corona Beer was two [crappy] quotes, some [random] shit slapped into some [gay] categories, and an NRV tag, which was perhaps the most intelligent thing on that whole article, while I had uploaded four images, copied raw code form 7 different templates (which was not easy to get right), and had to come up with a way to stretch "Ouroboros pwns you!!" into a decently-sized Uncyclopedia article. And for what? To have it flushed down the toilet by some gay admin and his posse of shadow sockpuppets on VFD. Fuck, the moment your shit gets onto VFD, I'm gonna so kill its ass. Ouroboros was a good article, the humor was just over your head. P.S.: before any of you ignorant fuckers say anything, let me make this clear: I STOPPED USING THE IRC TO SPAM OUROBOROS A LONG TIME AGO, SO GET OFF MY ASS ABOUT IT. --Dig It Zebra 21:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Notice that Uncyclopedia admins and users are talking about having sex with each other over some articles. Notice the big words "Fuck you twice over" offering to have sex twice. Also talking about slapping articles with nrv tags in some freaky kinky sex.
FUCK THOU UNCYLOPEDA
Clearly this member wanted to fuck the entire Uncyclopedia in one massive orgy, showing his interest in group sex.
Hello, I have just created the most useful Uncyclopedia tool ever. It counts how many times "fuck" appears in an article. Amazing! http://www.mandaliet.com/unfuck.php — Man Ballet 09:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Apparently this member create a tool to see how many times the word fuck appeared in an Uncyclopedia article. So we can find those who are obsessed with sex that write articles on Uncyclopedia.
Psychology[edit | edit source]
Clearly anyone who uses the word Fuck and Uncyclopedia in the same sentence is an Uncyclopedia Fucker or is obsessed with having sex with Uncyclopedia, its members, its admins, etc. Freudian Psychology would have a field day on this type of behavior. Clearly using Psychoanalysis we can deduce that these people are following The Pleasure Principle, and also thinking with their ID (Libito). Using the Primary Process, they dream about having sex with Uncyclopedia and act out their fantasies on the Uncyclopedia forum. They have at least entered the Anal phase (if they want Anal sex, for example) if not the Genital phase of sexual development. Clearly their unconscious mind desires to have sex with Uncyclopedia due to some Oedipus complex that they had when they were but children. Clearly this is an advanced case of Wikiphrenia.
Critics of Fucking Uncyclopedia[edit | edit source]
Some have said that if one has sex with Uncyclopedia, they have sex with everyone who had sex with Uncyclopedia. Apparently Uncyclopedia Fuckers like to have sex often and an almost countless number of times. They say that one can develop a habit and take up Kitten Huffing after sex, or get some sexually transmitted disease like AIDS. Some people like Nancy Reagan say "Just say no to fucking Uncyclopedia!", while others say that free love is not so bad Wiki-style.
Uncyclopedia Fucked You[edit | edit source]
And you like it, you little whore. The Uncyclopedia bent you over and you just took it.
Hey you asswholed! I ahte this plaec[edit | edit source]
i realy do. i m so mad i fele like teling name of editros who mak tis sit e so bad! Roman Dog Bird is a negro. hew cairs abuot tihs studip site urband ictionryaya.com is helo f mutch funyer! fuck youo im goin bad to ebaum sworld.
Dude, screw you...!!!