Forum:Is it over?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Is it over?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6899 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
"Wikia is playing with its servers today. We'll come back sometimes after tea time or when our DBAs will stop twiddling our thumbs".

I felt so helpless! So devoid of humor! The pain! the Misery! Could this be yet another foul play by Wikipedia? Can they not overcome the competition? Are we all going to die? Does in Soviet Russia, server updates YOU!!?!??! ~Jewriken.GIF 15:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

CALM DOWN, MATE. This is a good thing. /me does the "We're finally on 1.9" dance —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for troublemake it double? 16:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
It was all quite edumacational for me...I have now discovered there are some other sites on the Net, not just this one. RabbiTechno 16:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Seems that prefix= is broken. —Braydie 16:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
*frown*. This isn't all that futuristic. I put on my silver jumpsuit for nothing. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The big edit links are scary, Mommy. --Ж Kalir yes, I play Pokémon 18:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I lost my Bold, italic and other buttons for editing... oh noes! My Signature button too! --Kenvalyi 18:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
The heck? Big distracting edit links and no editor buttons? How exactly is this an upgrade? --Zyrac
I lost my mind. But I think that was unrelated to the upgrade. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Oops, I messed up the date on my post. GUESS WHY. --Zyrac 20:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ouch! Those corny big "edit" links are a plain eyesore. It's so ugly that I'm considering not using subsections in articles anymore (at least in my user page I'm sure I'll remove them). And what mean those red or green numbers that appear after the articles in "recent changes"? -- herr doktor needsAcell Rocket.gif [scream!] 21:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it's the gain/loss of characters...which is handy if you want to know if someone has blanked a page. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Now Alliteration and its children look stupid, what with those tiny tampered edit buttons...WHY did they have to put the edit section IN THE HEADER?! Its f*cking ugly. Atomik Spongeface 21:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure all these things will be fixed in due time. In the long run it will be worth it, all the cool kids were laughing at us for having a really old MediaWiki. D: —Braydie 21:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
This is due to the style for the edit section buttons being moved to the global CSS and removed from the inline HTML. However, Uncyclopedia has its own skin folder, so the CSS files, the JS files, and the PHP skin templates were not automatically upgraded with all the other Wikia (this will be a long term problem). This edit (clear your cache) should temporarily fix the edit buttons, but there will probably be more strange and minor things like this. --Splaka 22:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)