Forum:A thread on us I put up at Above Top Secret
I wrote an article on Above Top Secret, a fun website, and just awhile ago I put up a thread on that site linking to the article. So
People seem to like it so far, and have given me flags, stars, and geese. They seem like good folks there, and some know of Uncy, and one of them even linked an "Above Top Secret" page over in ED. Maybe one or two of them would like to play here sometime. And if you want to sign up as a member, even if you don't post, you can give me flags and stars - but mostly geese - and with a few more of those the thread will move on in their "elimination" process for more viewing. Aleister 1:30 5-4-'12
- Hey, good job! I personally always whore funny articles found on VFH once or twice a week. I also go on the streets with a megaphone shooting at people that Uncyclopedia is the shit.
Mattsnow 02:29, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
For. MrN 
02:31, Apr 5
- I'm on here, how do I give you stars? Mattsnow 02:53, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Stars are for only if you like the thread. They go right at the start of the thread, over on the left. But only if you like it, I don't want to whore stars - actually I don't even know what their point system is - but they help to boost the thread to the second list on the New Topics list, and more people see it. Geese, I don't know. Thanks! Aleister 2:58 5-4-'12
- I just posted a reply XD Mattsnow 03:04, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I appear to have only 11 ATS Points, 0 Flags and 0 stars whereas Mattsnow apparently has more. I suspect a conspiracy of some description. Probably involving the JFK assassination MrN 04:31, Apr 5
- LOL, are you the site owner?? I don't get it .... Mattsnow 04:59, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, not really, but I'm Good. Honest! MrN 05:12, Apr 5
- BTW, I couldn't figure out how to give you stars, flags or a goddamn magic wand. Gotta be more explicit, Al. Mattsnow 05:16, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Talking of mistaken identities, did you notice that Aleister got accused of being Jordan Maxwell on their page about the conspiracy about there being no Jordan Maxwell page at Wikipedia. Wait. You will tell me there is no Bill Cooper article there either next... Wait!!! What! Red links! MrN 05:25, Apr 5
- Mistaken identity? As you wish. Flags are the thing the page needs, they are given right above the first post, then to the left. Above, and to the left. It says "Flags". Maybe people don't see that if they're new members, to discourage multiple-people from another website "pushing" a thread, as if that would ever happen. Maybe you have to make a certain number of posts - but wait, MrN saw stars, so they must be seeable (the stars are at the start of each post itself. Mattsnow has two stars now, and MrN has one). You mean Bill, I mean Bill Cooper, doesn't have a wikipedia page either? We get no respect! DavidIcke 10:30 5-4-'12
- Na, they have one on Cooper, although it's a perfect piece of dis-info. No, it's US that does not have an article on him! Jim Mars 15:25, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Mistaken identity? As you wish. Flags are the thing the page needs, they are given right above the first post, then to the left. Above, and to the left. It says "Flags". Maybe people don't see that if they're new members, to discourage multiple-people from another website "pushing" a thread, as if that would ever happen. Maybe you have to make a certain number of posts - but wait, MrN saw stars, so they must be seeable (the stars are at the start of each post itself. Mattsnow has two stars now, and MrN has one). You mean Bill, I mean Bill Cooper, doesn't have a wikipedia page either? We get no respect! DavidIcke 10:30 5-4-'12
- Talking of mistaken identities, did you notice that Aleister got accused of being Jordan Maxwell on their page about the conspiracy about there being no Jordan Maxwell page at Wikipedia. Wait. You will tell me there is no Bill Cooper article there either next... Wait!!! What! Red links! MrN
- BTW, I couldn't figure out how to give you stars, flags or a goddamn magic wand. Gotta be more explicit, Al.
- Well, not really, but I'm Good. Honest! MrN
- LOL, are you the site owner?? I don't get it ....
- I appear to have only 11 ATS Points, 0 Flags and 0 stars whereas Mattsnow apparently has more. I suspect a conspiracy of some description. Probably involving the JFK assassination MrN
- I just posted a reply XD
- Stars are for only if you like the thread. They go right at the start of the thread, over on the left. But only if you like it, I don't want to whore stars - actually I don't even know what their point system is - but they help to boost the thread to the second list on the New Topics list, and more people see it. Geese, I don't know. Thanks! Aleister 2:58 5-4-'12
- I'm on here, how do I give you stars?
For. 
You're right - much nicer without the ads. Nominally Humane! 12:00 05 Apr
- Yikes, because of stuff occuring on the thread an admin just decided to remove any links to ED from their posts on the entire site. Good things do come in small quanta packages. And Jim Marrs used to post there and answer questions. he's got his own forum topic. And a few more flags may push the thread to the next level. Poor ED. Aleister 23:44 5-4-'12
And now a possible ED editor is taking lying low-down swipes at Uncyclopedia, calling us out like a gunslinger with sawdust in his eyes and a swig of whiskey on his breath. Aleister 12:01 7-4-'12
Personally, I'm more a fan of this site:
http://jeffgoldblumiswatchingyoupoop.ytmnd.com
User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:37, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
The "Above Top Secret" page...
is about to be featured in a few minutes, and I go to the site, and see:
HOTTEST TOPIC RIGHT NOW:
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, 32 member flags and 126 replies
Vitamin C is Above Top Secret: We all have a MAJOR genetic disease! Three grams of Vitamin C a day
my page on ATS on vitamin C is the hottest topic right now!
Praise Jah and Colonel Sanders for this bizarre conspiratorial coincindence. Aleister 00:00 17-4-'12
- Vitramin C? Nominally Humane! 06:44 17 Apr
A new thread at ATS links to our Main Page right now
Here is a new thread telling people there that we have the "Above Top Secret" page featured here today. They seem to like it, which is nice. Visit if you dare, ah, care, to. Aleister 00:47 17-4-'12
- Nice. Above Top Secret is not currently semi-protected, let's leave it like that for a bit. MrN 00:56, Apr 17
- MrN, you have a hint of larceny in your soul. A good idea, remember that guy a while back who kept on flooding the page and its talk page with the weird code? I'm surprised nobody has done it since, including the same guy. Aleister 1:24 17-4-'12
- Well, what we actually need to do is un-protect loads more pages, but we can't because we don't have monitoring recent changes organised well enough. We could have it organised well enough. We have enough people to watch it, we just need a way of knowing who has checked what and when that actually works, can't be dicked with too much and... actually works. See. I'm rambling again. Where did I put my... Slippers. Yes. MrN 01:33, Apr 17
- I couldn't agree less. Some of the fun pages could undergo an unprotection in hopes of catching vandals like glue catches wasps and ants together, and they fight, and then more glue is poured on top of them before the centipedes arrive. But just letting random edits flow like wine on feature pages or other interesting pages might set up a need to op ten more admins. Wishful thinking. Aleister 2:15 17-4
- A lot of people don't like centipedes agreed, but we could organise recent changes better. Somehow. MrN 04:22, Apr 17
- A recent changes flag? Complicated. Do-able, but long term do-able. I'll think about it. Might be able to get BB to set something up as my js God. Nominally Humane! 04:45 17 Apr
- On the mirror site, there is a patrolling option available to admins only, and the pages not patrolled yet are marked with an ! mark. Does the real Uncyc also have this feature? -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:30, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Or maybe even a page where people can say what time/date to what time/date they have checked. People could still check stuff if someone else had checked it, but a bit like UN:BP but for everyone. There could be a fair few problems with anything along those lines though. MrN 05:35, Apr 17
- There needs to be a flag option so when you look at RC you can see if it has been checked by a highlight or something similar, rather than jumping between lists. I'll start playing with ideas and see what I can create. Nominally Humane! 06:48 17 Apr
- Or maybe even a page where people can say what time/date to what time/date they have checked. People could still check stuff if someone else had checked it, but a bit like UN:BP but for everyone. There could be a fair few problems with anything along those lines though. MrN
- A lot of people don't like centipedes agreed, but we could organise recent changes better. Somehow. MrN
- I couldn't agree less. Some of the fun pages could undergo an unprotection in hopes of catching vandals like glue catches wasps and ants together, and they fight, and then more glue is poured on top of them before the centipedes arrive. But just letting random edits flow like wine on feature pages or other interesting pages might set up a need to op ten more admins. Wishful thinking. Aleister 2:15 17-4
- Well, what we actually need to do is un-protect loads more pages, but we can't because we don't have monitoring recent changes organised well enough. We could have it organised well enough. We have enough people to watch it, we just need a way of knowing who has checked what and when that actually works, can't be dicked with too much and... actually works. See. I'm rambling again. Where did I put my... Slippers. Yes. MrN
- MrN, you have a hint of larceny in your soul. A good idea, remember that guy a while back who kept on flooding the page and its talk page with the weird code? I'm surprised nobody has done it since, including the same guy. Aleister 1:24 17-4-'12