DO...
- For nominators: DO...
- ... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
- ... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
- ... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
- ... Add
{{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
- ... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.
- For voters: DO...
- ... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
- ... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so:
'''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
- ... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.
- For Administrators: DO...
- ... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
- ... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
- ... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
- ... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.
DON'T...
- ... Revert administrators.
- ... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
- ... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
- ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like
THIS to indicate that they have been kept.
Pages for Deletion
Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.
How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):
Notes for Administrators:
- Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
- Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
- To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
- If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
|
Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 104426 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (1) |
 Delete. I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. -   TALK What's it like to be a heretic?
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 2 Elapsed Time: 104427 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (2) |
- Delete. Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. - TALK What's it like to be a heretic?
- Delete. Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. Spıke ¬ 23:47 29-May-12
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 6 Elapsed Time: 104447 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (6) |
- Da fuq? - TALK What's it like to be a heretic?
- It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a non sequitur caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's what the fuq. ~ BB ~ (T)
 ~ Tue, May 29 '12 7:14 (UTC)
- I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!!
 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for Diet Coke, which itself is in sad shape. Spıke ¬ 11:50 29-May-12
- Reads like vandalism. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 Burninate! Too much crass, sex, and randomness. -- Sir CuteTomCruiseOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5 Elapsed Time: 104453 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Huff, then turn into a content fork. This is currently the top article on Special:LongPages, at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". -- Sir CuteTomCruiseOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. Spıke ¬ 13:27 29-May-12
- Another reason to huff: It's illogical to have a subpage of a redirect. -- Sir CuteTomCruiseOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
- That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:31, 30 May 2012
- Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. -- Sir CuteTomCruiseOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Huff outright. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 29 '12 7:10 (UTC)
- Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Pointless rambling. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Convinced by BB, below. Spıke ¬ 22:09 29-May-12
|
| Comments |
 Abstain. Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. Spıke ¬ 21:52 29-May-12
- I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 29 '12 21:56 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -2 Elapsed Time: 104461 hours
|
| Keep (5) |
- Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:56, 28 May 2012
- Keep. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:12, 28 May
- Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 Keep. That shit cray. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)- Feature!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (3) |
- Delete. It repeats itself. How is that funny?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I have the answer. It's not. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 13:28 28 May 2012
- Let's hear it again! No, let's not. Spıke ¬ 13:38 28-May-12
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -1 Elapsed Time: 104482 hours
|
| Keep (3) |
- Keep. "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. Spıke ¬ 17:24 27-May-12
- Keep. It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Not bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:27, 28 May 2012
|
| Delete (2) |
- Delete. The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
- This is pretty bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- @SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. Spıke ¬ 17:31 27-May-12
- I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. Spıke ¬ 10:01 28-May-12
- Previously VFD'd, Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." Spıke ¬ 17:35 27-May-12
- Better title would be Constitution (gaming) but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. Spıke ¬ 17:38 27-May-12
|
|
Score: -1 Elapsed Time: 104513 hours
|
| Keep (2) |
- Keep. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- This is-a bad. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, May 26 '12 9:52 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -3 Elapsed Time: 104555 hours
|
| Keep (5) |
- Keep. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Vital, maybe rewrite.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. For no reason lol. --2nd Chance for me (because I was banned.) (Say) 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. (Formerly Delete.)
Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (though it is being worsened by a newbie today). No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. Spıke ¬ 16:01 24-May-12
|
| Delete (2) |
- Delete.And redirect to End of Time. --Scofield & The Machine 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 16:55 28 May 2012
|
| Comments |
|
Archived VFD Discussions
 Archives
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
DO...
DON'T...
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
Delete. I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. - 
Keep. I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --
Abstain. Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. 
