From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: xkcd
|
Score: 19 witty stick figures who are writing viruses that read YouTube comments to people before they post them.
|
| Nominated by:
|
MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:46, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 19
|
- Nom and for Feature it, fgts. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:46, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A hearty yes! This deserves it. Also, for people who are dumb, the links on the bottom wortk. Yes, there is more than one. User:Mrthejazz/sig 11:49, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. At first I thought the whole page was just the comic at the top--which, by itself, would have still won my vote--but then I scrolled down. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:11, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 For. Mainly the comics  Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 15:59, August 29, 2010 (UTC)- For. WOW!!! Funnybony
   17:21, Aug 29 17:21, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:23, 29 August 2010
- Wow. I full expected to vote against because there are so many sites mocking xkcd full-time already, and I thought we ran the risk of making Uncyclopedia look like the Internet's retarded kid brother again. But, you know what? This is the best one.
 pillow talk 19:00, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 FOR —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 19:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)- Fixified, I can now vote for. G'job. (And nice comics.) ~
 (talk) (stalk) -- 20100829 - 19:49 (UTC)
- For. Pretty goddamn awesome. -- homely Ape () (Riot Porn) 01:39, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. One of the Best articles we've had in a long time. the only dilemma is whether or not it needs to be presented as a reskin, I'm in favour of a reskin of the Main Page. - Prof. Olipro
 KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:03, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA
 AMUSE ME 02:19, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- xkcd sucks.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  03:23, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes! Very funny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 17:51, Aug 30 2010
 Yes! Yes! Yes! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π ~  ~ 31 Aug 2010 ~ 01:18 (UTC)- For. Feature this! Dr. Fenwick 01:51, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
- 3.99 repeating Yay! ,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 02:08, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Very good. --UU - natter
 09:59, Sep 1
- fvwefewef Che
 } 21:36,1September,2010
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Cranky abstain. Someone fix the grammar and then maybe I'll vote for it. Seriously, <multiple things> is...? ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100829 - 14:21 (UTC)
- I'm making the same cranky abstain because I'm too lazy to fix it myself.--HM (T) 14:30, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- You all saw "xkcd" and couldn't help but to check it out, could ya? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:29, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Jesus Christ. I leave for a few hours after starting this and it gets put up that fast? It's a pity that the move log for the page was truncated so tragically early in its life, or you might have learned that I wasn't too proud of the quality (parodic or in general) of anything but the comics themselves (and those only somewhat). As to the "is" issue, I counted maybe 4 of them in the main body, but they were slightly offputtingly repetitive, so those ones are gone. As to the grammar, I suppose the biggest question I had is whether that appositive-laden 3-element list at the beginning would warrant being set off by semicolons. Also, the page looks great on my somewhat-current 1024x768 Firefox but terrible on the ancient IE6-running laptop I have laying around. Frankly though, I'm quite tired of trying to get around MediaWiki's odd implementation of inline CSS.
 KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:57, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Meep, I made some changes to the "grammar" (for lack of a better word) and tried to see if I could make the page a bit more readable, per Lyrithya and HELPME's concerns. If you don't like what I did, I invite you to revert. Cheers! pillow talk 19:09, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, not "grammar", quite. More a question of syntax. It's for the best that it's simpler and easier to read (fewer grammar questions to worry about anyway). I had been worried about excessive parentheses, but now that I see them it looks fine. You've also identified the real problem: the excessive use of plural, which was hard for me to discern, having written it. Thanks for the extra and less crap-encrusted pair of eyes. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:26, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain.. Having read this a few times I don't personally see what this is all about besides recognising that it makes jokes about in jokes. So will abstain.  RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:34, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- It's a satire of this webcomic. http://xkcd.com User:Mrthejazz/sig 13:43, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link (and I then saw Hype had put in links for his vote). Sorry, still not for me so that's why I have abstained on this one. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:58, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. Mainly the comics 
FOR —
Cranky abstain. Someone fix the grammar and then maybe I'll vote for it. Seriously, <multiple things> is...? 
