Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnScripts:Harry Potter and the Inevitable Musical, second nom

Article: UnScripts:Harry Potter and the Inevitable Musical	Score: 5
Nominated by:	RA HB 11:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
For: 12	For I actually voted against this last time, but I really don't know why. Unfortunately it may be a little out of date, but I still think it's pretty good. -RA HB 11:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Oh god yes You bastards stop abstaining and vote for this "utter shit" musical. Le Cejak • <14:28, 05 Jul 2008> Self For - TBH, I never thought this would be nommed again. Thank you VFH-fairy. -- absorbent Ape (taste) (Riot Porn) 20:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Fur~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 20:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC) For - That's fantastic, the Times picture is good too (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:17 For - This is Uncyclopedia, of course we need something like this that is this crazy to be highlighted! --ShadowyLeftHand 14:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC) I've wanted this to be featured forever. It rocks. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:09, Jul 9 For Nice formatting and good humour. Someone should check out the Catholic Church version of Harry Potter some day. Also, the author should try to aim for a series. --AldirTheKnight 17:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC) weak for. while it skeeves me out a little to vote to put this on the front page due to its content, its so thouroughly funny that i couldn't resist.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Strong For! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:05, Jul 24 Definitely - I'm finding this just totally hilarious and am confused about the preponderance of against votes. pillow talk 19:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC) For: I do agree that the fact that it's Harry Potter makes the vote harder, but a lot of people love those books and it is pretty funny. --mrmonkey72 15:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Against: 7	Is this what we feature these days? --Moneke 14:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC) I found the picture slightly funny. --Masterd 23:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Against. - I don't like the concept to much and I'm just not that fond of Harry Potter--Sycamore (Talk) 16:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Against Didn't do it for me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Against No laughs. And what's the point of abstaining? That's like voting for Nader... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC) No can has. No does want. sir sysrq @ 00:04 Jul 28 You call that a musical? Nigga, please. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	* Abstain. - The Concept (for me) is a little thin.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC) I doesn't like it Harry Potter, yeeach... but I feel it can be improved on/made shittier/whatever --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC) It's a good article and script, but not good enough for the feature. Mgr. Readmesoon **my voice my work vote for me** Hmmm...the concept's good, but I don't think the article, as it is, is quite substantial enough for a feature. Perhaps a bit of beefing up would make it so. BlueYonder 09:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)