Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Cancer is racist

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Cancer is racist (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Cancer is racist	Score: 12.5 racist attacks
Nominated by:	15Mickey20
For: 18.5	Self-nom & for. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)  For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)  For. Anything right-wing is good. JudgeZarbi TALK 21:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)  For. Same as above. Pucktard 12:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC) for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For. I liked it. --UU - natter 19:55, Oct 6 For. Very Onion-esque. Parsat (talk / contribs) 03:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC) For nice satire. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:22, Oct 9 For. 201.244.246.111 04:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Shame on you Mickey I could have nommed this --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC) For -RAHB 21:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC) For --GDawg816 15:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC) whoops I thought I already voted for this... Dark Ermac 13:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC) For made me roflcopter. COLIN ALL YOUR BASEHEANEY! AMERICA JOE THE PLUMBER IN '08!!! 17:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)  For. "White cell power!" PaddyAtkinson 02:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC) For. Nitroglycerin hates Arabs Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Loved it! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 05:41 4 November 2008 For More clever than funny, but good satire nonetheless. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) For. Why wasn't this written earlier? Meta 500 01:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against Well written as per usual (although the Tennis articles are much better). It just didn't make me chuckle. Geoffprickett 15:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)  Against. Awesome concept, but it felt like it didn't go anywhere with it. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:13 Oct 06, 2008 Against. alhtough this is put across quite comicly im pretty sure this is a well established theory that has been knocking about for almost 50 years. I watched several documentaries on the subject.quite good though VitalOD 00:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC) There had just been a news item on it. I believe a link had been noticed before, but the new study showed that the link was there for a medical reason rather than a diagnostic one. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  12:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Against. I like this article, but it doesn't stack up to other features, like, say, Sania Mirza or UnBooks:The secret diary of Andrew Murray, aged 20¾ . pillow talk 19:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)  Against. I agree with above, since I laughed when I saw the news headline but didn't laugh as much while actually reading it. APOLLO circa 1758 00:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Against. Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Pee review. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC) respectful abstain--Sycamore (Talk) 19:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Abstain. Mickey's my favorite author around here, so naturally there was stuff I liked in there. But there were parts that were kind of meh for me too, so that leads me to do the ever-useless abstain. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 22:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---