From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnMysteries:A Tissue Of Lies
|
Score: 17 hilariously mis-matched detective duos
|
| Nominated by:
|
UU - natter  12:44, Jul 23
|
For: 17
|
- SNF. Somebody mentioned the queue was getting low. Then somebody else mentioned nomming some old quasis. Then someone else said something about self-nomming, and something clicked, and here I am. I don't think I really expect this to succeed, as it's probably too much of my own sense of humour and no-one else's, but it got some decent reviews, and at least it makes the queue look busier. --UU - natter 12:44, Jul 23
- Let me tell you a story about UU: First, he writes this article back in, uh, 2007 or something. THEN he whores it on his userpage!! God dammit, UU! If you whore in my sight again I will banish you to blah blah blah good article. Le Cejak • <13:13, 23 Jul 2008>
 For. - good stuff--Sycamore (Talk) 13:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)- for. a corking good read. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- for.. Wow UU did a self nom? Must be good. Oh, it is. Not sure about the idiots who did your Pee Reviews though... MrN
 01:51, Jul 24
- FOR! Brilliant. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Strong for - Absolutely fantastic
 (Bonner)  (Talk) Jul 25, 09:24
- For
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Noir with some Sherlock Holmes, music, and toilet paper? It's everything I could've wished for. --mrmonkey72 17:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Strong for - This is great! I suspect the reason it only made it to QFA before is that it starts off slowly and takes a while to get into. As funny as it is, I wonder if the foreword at the top is preventing some people from reading further.
 pillow talk 19:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I liked it, but I should probably tell them I agree with Hyperbole about the foreword. "I liked it," I mentioned with a quiet confidence, "but I agree with Hyperbole about the foreword." The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 19:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- FEATURE THIS NOW!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- As with the last time. ~
 07:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC) I'm pretty sure that's not what I wanted to write, but it sounds so damn silly, I'll just keep it. ~ 07:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- For How did this not pass VFH before? -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN19:24, 26 Jul
- For -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 00:29, Jul. 27, 2008
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 12:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I remember this. Fondly. /me fondly fondles Fonzy...oh god I'm losing it... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:02, Jul 27
- Phor Very very very very good ~ Mgr.ReadMeSoon!? 23:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
12:44, Jul 23
For. - good stuff--
21:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)