Uncyclopedia:VFH/Thomas Aquinas (retry)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Thomas Aquinas (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Thomas Aquinas	Score: 14 ridiculously long trips on foot
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 16	Nom + For. Old QFA, does a great take on faux-history, like many other Insineratehymn pieces. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 20:23, Jan. 23, 2008 For Just my style.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Summa For Nothin, and my chicks for free. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:33, Jan 24 For--Æ 01:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For again. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Dig again also. Pulls off the daunting task of being long and consistently funny. --THINKER 20:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For. Although against reading the whole thing first thing in the morning. Never has funny felt more like work. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Oh, I didn't vote for this again yet? I know I voted last time....I think. I liked it anyways. But um....for...again -RAHB 08:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For. A lot of non-sequiturs, but they seem to fit, for the most part. This is odd, as they aren't supposed to. That's their whole raison d'etre. That's Spanish for herpes. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)  For., although the redlinks ain't pretty. But then again, I'm OCD.--Vana 22:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Whoa That was bizarre. --THE 12:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC) For I always support religious scholars. --Composure1 22:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC) For MrN 23:11, Jan 27 Put this Mother Fucker on the Front page, YEAH! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 2	Against sorry. It feels, to me, more like it'd belong on ?pedia. And after all, ?pedia-style articles are frowned upon here. Plus, i didn't enjoy reading it. No offense! --~Fag x FS 20:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Against per Fag. --Dexter111344 22:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Blahh, I hate voting against, I'm no good at it =P --~Fag x FS 21:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC) What do you mean 'pedia style articles are frowned upon here, this is the entire purpose of the website. We create spoof encyclopedic style articles filled with funny. Its in the rules and everything. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Not 'pedia, ?pedia. Short for Illogicopedia. It's another wiki that was founded by our own Hindleyite and Silent Penguin and is more random than Uncyc. A lot of stuff that gets rejected here ends up there. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC) You guys are weird. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---