From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Terry Gilliam
|
Score: 14 box office bombs
|
| Nominated by:
|
Black flamingo
|
For: 15
|
- NF. This has long been a favourite of mine. Recently realised it wasn't featured. Let's do something about that. --Black Flamingo 19:11, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 Brazil—where hearts were entertaining June—his films were out of money soon—and left a lot of dreamscapes strewn                Sir MacMania GUN—[19:25 17 Aug 2010]- For. Funnybony
   21:13, Aug 17 21:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. An excellent article by GT, who doesn't really come around anymore, unfortunately. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:20, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:38, 18 August 2010
- For. All you need to know after reading this article is that it deserves to be featured. Excellent!
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:39, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Very fine. --UU - natter
 09:50, Aug 18
- Flour I'm voting in place of Hunter Thompson, who couldn't make this round. Aleister 12:52 18 8
- Yep. And it's not just because Mr. Gilliam is just around the corner, watching me...
 KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:34, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I enjoyed the heck out of this article! Thanks for a quality read! S3ahawk 23:15, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Oh, gods... ~
 Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100819 - 00:14 (UTC)
- For. --Sog1970 20:58, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:17, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Dame
  16:13, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ChiefjusticeWii 16:17, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
 Against. I'm sorry. Per Dr. Fenwick, but against. It just didn't work for me. —YID WHORE  Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:28 21 August 2010]
|
| Comments
|
While "doesn't really come around" isn't an egregious exaggeration - it's true I have had very little time lately with a new job and a dastardly commute (which might serve as a euphemism for the possibly equally true excuse of "no new ideas") - I have been coming around to do regular maintenance and IP-reverting work on my own stuff. But since I have been entirely narcissistic in all of the work I have done here lately, I will in the interest of propriety forego this or any other self-vote until such time as I can vote in a more socially engaged way. But thanks for the nom and fors, guys. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 20:26, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Normally it's bad form to make changes during VFH voting, but I think if we are going to consider featuring this the Imaginarium section should be fixed to eliminate the datedness. Someone say "Yes you're right - do it." -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 03:42, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right, do it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:08, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain. While I find this hilarious its so indentical to the real Terry Gilliam its hard to say if this shouldnt be the wikipedia entry on him. Dr. Fenwick 22:42, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Forgot to mention, a few hours after I voted for this, Brazil came on and I got to watch it the whole way through for once. Eerie. KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 23:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Brazil—where hearts were entertaining June—his films were out of money soon—and left a lot of dreamscapes strewn 
Against. I'm sorry. Per Dr. Fenwick, but against. It just didn't work for me. —
