User talk:MacMania

This user is not a member of en.uncyclopedia.co

This user joined the Uncyclopedia website when it was hosted by (the almighty evil) Wikia. They have not yet joined the new domain. Please do not leave messages for them, as they will most likely not be answered. This page has been maintained for archival purposes, and to prevent confusion.

---

Er, I'm gone. UPDATE: I still am rather thoroughly gone, and I'll have to make this update fairly short because I wasted most of my time trying to recover my password using two cups of Earl Grey and an atomic vector plotter, and also because there is a man pointing an onion at my head. I hope it's Stephen Fry or Hugh Laurie, and I especially hope it's Mr Fry because in that case it's more likely actually to be an apple. Regardless: I did forget to mention this: I beg of anyone who stumbles across this message to put anything in my userspace to every conceivable possible use (for the good of the website, of course—I create my articles to help mankind, not to destroy it) and do so without my permission. Articles available include but is not limited to the things listed in the Reviews section way below. You can even claim authorship for them, if you like. That's it, really. (I really only came back because the ED article on TV Tropes mentioned our article on it as nailing everything wrong with it, and 1) I find such concessions in meaningless hostility hilarious, and 2) it reminded me that this website existed and used to be a fairly substantial, certainly memorable, and mostly enjoyable part of m'life.) Unless someone monitoring the recent changes log could also lock this page, which would be moist and fluffy. —MacMania 31/03/2011 and I haven't the faintest idea what the time is

AHAHAHAH

Yes, that's a mistake you don't want to have. Thanks for that! Also, I believe your talk page has been despoiled. ~ 13:36, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, hello—[plays around with talk page] new page. That's weird. So where was I? Oh yes—Barcelona! Er, I mean, not a problem at all, and you'd be correct. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:43 2 Aug 2010]

Contest today, August 2nd (U.S. time) or 3rd (civilized world time)

(Pre-recorded announcement)

Happymonkey called for a writing contest which will start at 2:00 UTC (10 p.m. eastern time in the United States and other weird countries). Contestents will give each other an exact name of an article at app. 9:59 eastern time, and then we will write until 11:15 (3:15 UTC). We need at least one judge who will look at all the articles, say nay, or yay, or something, and tell us whatever they want to. Please sign up on Happymonkeys talk page, as participant or judge(s), and then we can pair people up around 9:30 eastern and let them know who they will give their page title to. (Inspired by DrSkullthumper's contest of a month or so ago). Aleister 16:05 2 8

Pee Reviews: A Thought

Hi Mac, just dropping by to have a quick word about pee reviews. I'm wandering through the queue keeping an eye on things, and I notice that a significant percentage of the requests are from you. Not a problem there at all - being prolific is a good thing, and I like your work. But... One thing: if you've already had a good review from someone, and made their suggested changes, do you think you could go back to them in the first instance and ask if they think it is sufficiently improved? And, further to that, if they think it's now worth a nom? I only mention this because there are several requests of yours for a second review for articles that now sit on VFH, suggesting that's possibly a wasted request.

Obviously asking for multiple reviews is not a bad thing, and this is in no way a nasty admin threat or anything, it's just a suggestion to avoid unnecessary requests clogging the queue. Hope you think it makes sense. And keep writing, my friend, I like your work! --UU - natter 12:00, Aug 3

He doesn't really, he hates you, he told me so, he just said that to soften the veiled threat of the above. Listen... you hear that? Exactly, UU has just killed every pet you owned, even the ones that were already dead. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 12:06, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Uh, I don't know how to tell you, Chief, but you're amusingly mistaken. I was killing every pet you own. --UU - natter 12:10, Aug 3

But how could you, I only have one pet and that is my lovely pet brick and he cannot be killed by any tool or craft that we here possess. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 12:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

You are obviously not aware of all the tools and craft that I possess... --UU - natter 12:41, Aug 3

That explains my Tamagotchi-clone's mysterious death. 17 virtual years and nothing happens, then he just died. You mani—

Oh, wow, people like my work! And blast me, I go off to have a spot of lunch and this happens? Blimey you people are fast.

OK, I'm running through the queue looking at what's current. By my count I have seven requests that are original, and two that haven't had a review in almost a year. But in saying this I'm completely missing your point, because I do see three that are under that conflict (hey, who deleted two of m—oh, hullo UU), and three in-depth reviews = quite a bit of time spent.

So I do apologise for the inconvenience, and I'll try to be more cautious about submitting stuff for a second review in the future. I actually did ask for post-improvement opinions from the original reviewers for my self-noms, but I always fear that having just one review limits the potential audience or whatever other demographic nonsense. Now, to figure out why I woke up so blasted late today ... Sir MacMania GUN—[12:25 3 Aug 2010]

As I say, it's not a big deal, just a suggestion. But you might find that your original requests get attended to quicker if the queue is smaller. I have a theory that a longer queue, rather than prompting people to roll up their sleeves and help out, actually puts people off reviewing. In which case, having those 3 conflicts could be a bit of a hindrance. Of course, that could be so much hot air, but whatever, I personally recommend not having too many requests in the queue at once - if you have a few, rather than submit another request, why not go to someone and bug them about doing one of the existing reviews for you? Tends to work if you're polite about it, and pick the right person. Again, another suggestion from personal experience, you can ignore it if you so prefer. --UU - natter 12:47, Aug 3

Hm, this is probably all true and well-tested. Then again, oftentimes if I'm looking to do a review, I look at the eight requests that come up on the main review page, but to each his/her own. Thanks for the suggestions!—experience can't be too bad of a basis—although I fear I may not be secure or polite enough to gently ask for reviews, you [redacted] Sir MacMania GUN—[12:54 3 Aug 2010]

Contest

Yah i tried to change it...twice, but my internet started to be stupid. Thanks! --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 02:20, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. Sir MacMania GUN—[02:21 4 Aug 2010]

Thanks

Seems I've forgotten basic wiki editing during my week away from the site. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:36, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. I've done worse—the only reason I don't make mistakes is that I stick to that thing that does the voting for me, and even then I get an extra timestamp in there sometimes. Sir MacMania GUN—[16:40 4 Aug 2010] 16:40, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

That review was very enlightening and helpful...and :(...funnier than the article which it was reviewing... Thanks man Ragnarok 16:59, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem! Didn't see this earlier. (note: moved down to the appropriate time and date sorting as well) Sir MacMania GUN—[21:28 11 Aug 2010]

This is for you

Rejoice, MacMania! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Did I mention what a beautiful person you are? Thanks for all your hard work over at Pee Review. Why not add yourself to the Fresh Stains list so that you can be eligible for RotM, and possibly a lot more sex?? --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 17:40, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Gah, I'd feel guilty about being on the list and then not being around for the rest of the year. But thanks anyhow. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:02 7 Aug 2010]

Thanks

Rejoice, MacMania! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

For that Kamino review. --Some Idiot 09:27, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:02 7 Aug 2010]

That mafia edit

Was that your bot or you? Either way, thanks! Have a cookie.

YesTimeToEdit has awarded you a cookie! For mafia assistance.

- [13:55 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Not-a problem. Always glad to help out the venerable family. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:02 7 Aug 2010]

Also, I am my own bot. It's some sort of technological singularity thing, bots designing themselves. Not my own sockpuppet, though. Don't see how that could work unless my hand was made out of wool. Soft, comfy wool, mind you, but nonetheless the point stands that I would have my hand made out of wool. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:04 7 Aug 2010]

Asides from hands made out of wool, YOU'RE YOUR OWN BOT?!? - [14:14 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

It's all a bit fuzzy at the moment, but as of right now, that's what my userpage appears to say. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:17 7 Aug 2010]

I shall wonder off looking a tad confused, leaving a strange smell behind. - [14:25 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Trust me, I'm more confused than you are, and I'm starting to smell something burning. Namely, my own positronic brain. Also, at least I'm not a Dalek, so that's a plus. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:26 7 Aug 2010]

Could really ruin your day being a Dalek, you know. - [14:54 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Especially one of the new ones—it's like Technicolour caps lock. AD-MIRE MY BRIGHT TA-CKY CO-LOUR-ING! FEAR IT! O-BEY! O-BEY!

Also, I would love to join the family under different circumstances (i.e. ones in which I have all the spare time in the world), but I'm afraid I can really only be around for a few more weeks. After that, it's off to the land of university/college/whatever it's called around these parts, I fear. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:58 7 Aug 2010]

Don't worry about it! So let me get this straight, you don't have an actual bot, do you, you just have neuro-bot syndrome and pretend to be one, for reasons known only to you?

Also, my main problem with them there new daleks is not the colour but how big and ugly they look really. The actual shape. Eugh. - [15:12 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

I believe it's also called cosplay syndrome.

Hm, Hunchbacks of Skaro City? Hopefully they avoid filming Daleks from the side in the future, since those shots really get problematic. Either that or pretend that they're wearing one of those elaborate dresses, but that'd just make them look even sillier. Sir MacMania GUN—[15:20 7 Aug 2010]

I say we write a written complaint to Dalek Management...actually there might be an article in that... - [15:26 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Popping in. Yes, it is a bot, but all of us here know that. Just look at how it puts all of its pages up on Feature nom, one right after the other, a glitch or a bug in the software. It's a test by Intel on an advanced chip array--something about gas-induced computer tech--and we agreed to test it here. Almost passes the Turing test, but you can see the mistakes at times. As for Dalek's, glance at my Garage sale page, there's one wandering around there too. Be seeing you YesTimeToEdit. (when it says it has to go back to college, it is referring to the end of the test period) Aleister 15:27 7 8

Oh dear I am mightily confused. Feel like a little noob all over again. - [15:39 7 August 2010] TheYet•Talk

Hats off to you!

That amazing image on beigeopedia is amazing man! Thank you so much!

[unmerited ninjastar removed]

If you don't mind, I'll pass this on for you to MeepStarLives, who actually created the image in the first place. Sir MacMania GUN—[15:28 9 Aug 2010]

Say

Any special reason you're using OGG files? It's sort of a dead format. Can you upload it as MP3? ~ 22:40, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Open-source forever! The sourcetree-huggers over at the Spoken Wikipedia guidelines were the only reason. Seeing how everyone's using MP3 around these parts, I'll get MP3 versions up sooner than later, i.e. after I've finished with the 2001 narration. Merging 5.1 channels into 2 takes quite a bit of time, apparently. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:49 9 Aug 2010]

Gah, I just realised the other reason as I've been trying to compress my 2001 narration: the blasted dead format gets better quality on lower bitrates, and as it is said 2001 narration clocks in at 216% of the 10MB limit. Blast. Ah well, here goes compression at 56kbps ... Sir MacMania GUN—[05:12 10 Aug 2010]

Thanks!

I am eternally grateful! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:37, 10 August 2010

I thought you might like this

Have you seen this already? I was laughing the whole time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:55, 10 August 2010

Best episode between the TV movie and the 2005 revival. No, but seriously, Curse of Fatal death is great stuff. 900 years in a sewer ... Thanks for the recommendation anyhow, and I definitely agree that I might like this, seeing that I do. Sir MacMania GUN—[19:28 10 Aug 2010]

I should've known from this image you would've seen it. By the way, shall I just revert The Doctor back to the featured version or do you think there are some good edits among the recent changes? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:18, 10 August 2010

Oh dear. I'll take a look at it and weed through stuff myself. But thanks for the constant maintenance—appreciate it as always! Sir MacMania GUN—[22:21 10 Aug 2010]

flaring success

My god...the antics of uncyclopedia make me honestly laugh out loud sometimes. You are witty and funny. Write more really good stuff! Shabidoo 21:07, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

I always try my best (with emphasis on try rather than best). Thanks! Sir MacMania GUN—[21:24 11 Aug 2010]

Ugh

Thats just gloves so don't be afraid of them.--Slicky 02:38, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

AAH! Poorly rendered low-poly monochrome CGI gloves that fit my idea of Peter Pettigrew's weird liquidy silver glove—so well, in fact, that it fits said idea like, well, a glove. What was I talking about? Ah yes. AAH! [runs away] Sir MacMania GUN—[02:48 12 Aug 2010]

Theres no need for that and thats Master Hand & Crazy Hand actually.--Slicky 02:51, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, yes, the Master Hand with its firm, striking pose, and the Crazy Hand that looks like it's trying to Force Choke me ... wait, what?—AAH! [runs away unnecessarily] Sir MacMania GUN—[02:52 12 Aug 2010]

Well Crazy Hand can probably help and he can fly and everything with his powers and no he's not, he's just a glove he can't move unless you wear him.--Slicky 03:16, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

You wouldn't happen to have an image of that flying bus from "Planet of the Dead", would you?

Because that's what I was actually looking for when I stumbled upon Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death. I also encountered a video with a couple Daleks calling a Cybermen Call Centre, resulting in the shouting of "PRO-CRAS-TI-NATE!" a few times. All pretty funny, really. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:04, 12 August 2010

There's the flying Titanic from Voyage of the Whatever over here, but haven't seen Planet of the Dead yet, actually. Hm, I'll go find it. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:07 12 Aug 2010]

Silly me. Looking all over YouTube to find a video of Planet of the Dead, while there'd obviously be a fair-use image on Wikipedia. I did watch it on YouTube once and enjoyed it rather well. So I can certainly recommend watching it, along with "The Next Doctor" and "The Waters of Mars" of course. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:14, 12 August 2010

And now I have some nice images of the bus flying in two different environments. Thanks again, MacMania! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:17, 12 August 2010

Not a problem. I did watch the first scene of "The Next Doctor", and from what I've seen, I've gained a perverse desire to see David Morrissey as the Doctor in a full series. Looks hammy and middle-aged enough for me. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:19 12 Aug 2010]

On another though related note, I was wondering how you'd like this little page. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:27, 12 August 2010

Heh, rent axe time. I rather like the idea, although obviously you'll need to write a bit more than that. If you're looking for authentic Kaled images, Genesis of the Daleks has an awful lot of Kaleds and Thals in it, though I suspect you already knew this. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:37 12 Aug 2010]

I was thinking about basing the whole article on the anagram joke, deviating hugely from how they are depicted in the series. Like Skaro being named after the high occurrence of Orkas and stuff like that. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:54, 12 August 2010

A-ha, gotcha. So Thals = Halts and Davros = A svord (yes, it's spelled badly, but still)? Interesting idea, and I'd like to see how it progresses. Sir MacMania GUN—[04:07 12 Aug 2010]

Chekhov's review

Here ya go. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:39, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

I thank you

As of recently, I have adopted the policy of "just-in-case/making-it-easier-for-me" when it comes to thanking people for voting. This way I don't have to dispatch a whole load of generic templates afterwards. Sure it's a waste if I lose. Anywho, if that article goes on to be featured: Thanks for helping feature Why?:I'm In court, Mum. If the before mentioned article is not feature then please consider the following: Sod you! That is all. Thanks. :) —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [00:13 14 August 2010]

Brilliant idea you came up with there. Therefore I won't use it, because you came up with it before I did.

Not a problem. Sir MacMania GUN—[00:16 14 Aug 2010]

I am quite brilliant you see... —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [00:22 14 August 2010]

Physics

Looks good. Them commacides and whatnot seem to have served you well. And I'm glad to see it was mainspaced... took long enough. Cheers. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 03:35 (UTC)

You sir!

You wouldn't bee looking to create another of your famous article narrations? ~ Mordillo where is my FAGGOT? 12:36, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Been looking at this one for a while in general, and it looks stellar. Too stellar. I don't think I could do this justice—the baby voice, for instance. The article has a lot of rich emotion and expressiveness that jumps out of the text, and I can't really act that well. That, and I have a sore/congested throat.

I might eventually go through a few trial runs, and if it works out I'll let you know, but chances don't look very promising. Sorry. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:34 17 Aug 2010]

That, and the feature queue's looking perilous. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:36 17 Aug 2010]

Only if you can spare the time and emotion! :) ~ Mordillo where is my FAGGOT? 21:03, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

In the last three days...

...there's been a Russian-related article written by you and reviewed by me, a Japanese-related article written by you and reviewed by me, and an article written by me concerning both nations featured on the front page consecutively. It's not really all that important, I was just excited for noticing and thought I'd share the insight with someone. Kind of an interesting coincidence, though. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:50, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Russo-Japanese Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I'm considering changing this template, but it probably won't happen.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:57, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

---

Also, be sure to note that hyper-interesting observation I mentioned above, because, as I said, it's hyper-interesting. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:57, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fascinating. I was wondering why the universe had just imploded, leaving a hole in space-time the exact size of Eurasia. Sir MacMania GUN—[15:09 19 Aug 2010]

thank you

thank you for trying to fix Everybody hates this page --*-User:S1312-* 04:17, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure nobody will let it be destroyed as long as it lives. Sir MacMania GUN—[04:27 20 Aug 2010]

Award from UN:REQ

This user created HowTo:Be Japanese, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested articles. You're welcome!

This user created Rosetta Stone, an article originally requested on Uncyclopedia:Requested articles. You're welcome!

VAGINA

Paizuri has awarded you a cookie! For reverting very original talkpage vandalism.

Just pretend it's a vagina. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 22:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Heh, I thought you'd vandalised the page from the automatic edit summary. Thanks—[gets Earl Grey to go with biscuit/cookie/whatever you people call it] Sir MacMania GUN—[22:38 20 Aug 2010]

I'm feeling in a vandalrific mood. Do you want your talkpage vandalised? —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:40 20 August 2010]

Did you know that Australia is having a federal election today? And when doing a spell check on one of my articles Why? discovered that Australian English dictionary was the only one that recognised cunt as a valid word? I only mention this as a passing curiousity, as we're in the process of trying to work out which cunt will end up leading the cuntry. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 23:02, Aug 20 2010 UTC

A Welsh person who supports a governmental Internet filter or a "mad monk". Decisions, decisions, decisions. Sir MacMania GUN—[20:30 21 Aug 2010]

No fancy templates, like you did for your articles..

But I thought I'd sya thanks anyway for voting on my Propaganda article:-)

--Sycamore (Talk) 15:51, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, this is like my revolutionary amazing new thanking idea thing! You probably thought it up before me, but it's so much less hassle and no generic templates. Everyone wins! —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [18:35 21 August 2010]

Would some propaganda convince you both that templates aren't generic? I'm just saying that because I'm a template-thanker, although you may be convinced otherwise with some work.

Not a problem. Sir MacMania GUN—[20:28 21 Aug 2010]

Oh, Room 101 can be a bitch. Also, how come there's no article?! Shocker. Templates are lovely, I just decided to switch to personal messages because it's actually easier to thank people as you go. I suppose you could do that with templates, too. I also have a sneaky feeling people notice your article more and go read it and cast their opinion. —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [20:39 21 August 2010]

Hm, this actually sounds very reasonable. O'Brien, cancel the procedure. Also, Room 101 has no article because it clearly doesn't exist. Wait, wasn't it/isn't it a TV show? Sir MacMania GUN—[20:46 21 Aug 2010]

It was a TV show, I believe. I never saw the show, but I'm pretty certain that I can suffix that last sentence with "unfortunately". And it is fairly reasonable, I like to think. Every time I see a new for vote, I'll just go and thank that person. Then if the article is featured I can simply bask in my glory, rather than worrying about handing out templates. You could compare it to giving thank you notes as soon as someone gives you a present, as opposed to giving them all afterwards. I suppose. Actually, that's a terrible analogy. Scratch that. —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [20:58 21 August 2010]

Seeing that Stephen Fry went on the show and successfully banished Room 101 to Room 101, I think you might be right. Mind you, I still won't forget the time on QI that he claimed Welsh didn't have a word for the colour blue, but still. I think I might adopt that tactic with future nominations, except using templates ... see, the analogy works better if you have the thank-you notes ready anticipating presents. Although it fails if all they have is rotten tomatoes and dead cats. Sir MacMania GUN—[21:19 21 Aug 2010]

This is all true. And do feel free to adopt the tactic, of course I will have to charge a small royalties fee. Everyone has to earn their living. Payable in cookies and cabbages. —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:47 21 August 2010]

I couldn't...

...get your autograph, could I? —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:59 21 August 2010]

You made it so easy that I couldn't resist. Sir MacMania GUN—[23:05 21 Aug 2010]

Excellent! —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [23:08 21 August 2010]

YTTE

Ya i noticed that, and i fixed it, but it didn't go through, apparently someone constantly was editing the page the same time as me...yet the person that edited the same time as me, was me... it was weird, but i was aware of what happened. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Happymonkey39 (talk • contribs)

I fixed it. Silly.--HM (T) 02:33, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Same thing happened to me. CURSE YOU HELPME! (curse invalid in North America and Europe) And to make it worse, you edit-conflicted me just now. Sir MacMania GUN—[02:34 23 Aug 2010]

It's my name?! —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [10:58 23 August 2010]

Penis times 1000

Did I hear "penis"? —P'KANG WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [18:20 23 August 2010]

Hi. Saw you erased Gomphog's penis infection at Lyth's. Good. I thought of doing that but didn't want to mess with someone's talk page. Good for you. Aleister 18:12 23 8

Well, it was 1.6MB of useless text (talk pages don't really go beyond even 200KB in most cases), so it seemed like a good idea. Sir MacMania GUN—[18:17 23 Aug 2010]

(original post since modified to thumbnail at right—ed.)

MacMania, thank you, by the way.

*hug* You've earned a hug, here. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100823 - 19:04 (UTC)

You get a cookie for your troubles!

Thatdamnedfollowspot has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Because I'm feeling too lazy to make a template showing you my thanks, here's a cookie that's left over from the batch that took me 16 days to make. With my bare hands. Thanks for voting for me for Noob of the Month! Enjoy your baked goods! Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 15:45 Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Thank You

^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 19:45, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

So

See you later, then? --UU - natter 14:33, Sep 1

Smoke me a kipper—you know how this sentence ends. (Not looking forward to Series X either, FYI—Naylor relegating Series 9 to off-screen hijinks was an awful copout.) Sir MacMania GUN—[14:35 1 Sep 2010]

Reviews

Since you've apparently gone, here's a notice and link for whenever you come back - HHGG review here. Cheers. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 21:16 (UTC)

And Ultra Light Me here. Sorry it wound up so terrible. I really had no idea what I was talking about. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100908 - 03:58 (UTC)

And The next version, though the flamingo is right about it being VFH-worthy as is. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 23:35 (UTC)

Did Rosetta Stone, now, too. Lovely article. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 02:32 (UTC)

Extra-Special Form-Letterised Thank You Template

MacMania, thanks for joining the official Nancy Drew Mystery Stories™ Fan Club!

Your vote to preserve the heritage of the classic Nancy Drew Mystery Series for Girls automatically and irrevocably enters you into a contract with Dunnit and Grosslap, the nation's premier reprinter of mystery and adventure serials for children.

For just pennies a day, you are making a contribution that will slow the decay of childhood literacy in the developed world. Kids, check out this never-before released installment of Nancy Drew!

They’re Trying to Euthanize Me, Nancy!

As a Lifetime Member™, MacMania, you'll enjoy a variety of
exclusive benefits* only available to the most loyal of juvenile mystery enthusiasts.
These exciting benefits include, and are indeed limited to: feeling good about your generous contribution to young readers everywhere, a substantially reduced rate on shipping and handling charges for every Stratemeyer Signature Series Collection™ title you purchase using the handy form included in the back of every book, exclusive offers and communications from our affiliates only available to members, and a chance to win a free voucher entitling you to an opportunity to purchase a ticket for a raffle that could potentially unlock access to wide variety of restricted titles and memorabilia from our limited-circulation backcatalog.

* All terms, conditions, and entitlements subject to revision without notice.

And an extra-special thank you for your help regarding changes to this very template, without which a select number of Uncyclopedians would elsewise be forced the learn the virtue of patience. Plus a whole bunch of other advice you've given me over the past month and a very exhaustive and helpful review of Green Dam Youth Escort. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:09, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

God Uses A Mac!

CONGRATULATIONS! YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HELL!! Your vote of confidence is crucial for our continued efforts to realize the galactic potential of Judgment Inc. Teamwork will be essential in the pursuit of our goals and we appreciate your patience during this transitional phase of our growing company and it's subsidiaries. I can assure you that your sacrifices are being noted and the management team suggests that you to read the book of Job as many times as possible in order to make your life seem more like paradise by comparison. Don't forget that first born males are due by the end of the fiscal year so don't delay submitting your offering. Thanks!

--    11:13, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

The Next Version

Hi there, I was perusing the pee queue when I came across your article "The Next Version". Now ordinarily when I come across such a good article I just nom it, however I notice that the article is still in your userspace. If you want to mainspace it, I will go ahead with the nom, but if you would still really like a review I'll leave you to it (although I for one wouldn't know what else to say other than that the reception section is slightly weaker). --Black Flamingo 19:28, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

HOLY FUCK YES!!!

THANK YOU for fucking voting me the motherfucking writer of the month!!!1 You rule!!!1 Fuck yeah!!!1 !!!!! User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:13, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Mac

First of all, I miss you greatly. Second of all, I nominated your article on Moby-Dick. Just letting you know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:30, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

It got featured, just so you know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:30, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Read your note

And why is it you can't return here from time to time? And how did you forget your password, was it torture. Are you in Libya or Yemen or somewhere sandy like that? Aleister 21:37 31-3-'11

What he said. 1234 ~ 21:55, 31 March 2011

I can, but I can't really write anything new because I'm now working even in the summer (gasp)—at university lab—and between toying with Python, physics, panel shows, and Minecraft, time is short. And what is this thing you call proper time management? (Password recovery wasn't such a pain after I realised my Gmail was set to filter out Uncyc mail—quite a lot better than Yemen, and nowhere near as torturous as that one Babel fish puzzle from the H2G2 text adventure.) — Sir MacMania GUN—[03:25 3 Jul 2011]

Hullo, I used to have a username that was similar to yours. I am fond of your signature. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 06:09, 3 July 2011

Yo

Hope you don't mind that I've moved Rosetta Stone out of userspace and into main. I wanted to nom it for feature! --Black Flamingo 19:26, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Your downfall article now belongs to me! Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

He has never logged in here, so he'll likely never see this message.2601:1:C100:306:BD09:FD57:E283:56F8

Indeed, he hasn't. I should've seen this earlier but, well, problem's fixed now. Also, "your article now belongs to me" is not a very good way to ask someone's permission for.. anything! --Mimo&maxus 21:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)