Uncyclopedia:VFH/If you loved THAT, you’ll love THIS

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

If you loved THAT, you’ll love THIS (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: If you loved THAT, you’ll love THIS	Score: 18 VOTES FOR THE BEST ARTICLE OF ALL TIME
Nominated by:	Mhaille
For: 19	Gather 'round children, for the article that was BORN for VFH. Very SN&F. Danger, may contain satire and irony. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) For - I preferred THAT but THIS was good too. -- remarkable Ape (plagiarize) (Riot Porn) 21:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Strong For, Mhaille at his best and brightestness. Can we give him an armchair or something? -- The Zombiebaron 21:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)  For.. Blah blah blah, "genius of a writer", blah blah, "indispensible to the site", blah blah, "favourite author by several orders of magnitude". No, really. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC) F♥r. Whatevar. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 00:05 4 Feb, 2008) For. The "open ended" link would almost be enough by itself, frankly, but yeah, this is good. I also have a sneaky feeling it's trying to make a point, but I have a history of missing such things... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC) O HAI FOR--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 21:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC) For I suppose. Though I think it suffers from too much, I'll let it slide.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC) For - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 17:54, Feb 5 Weak For I don't really like self reflective stuff that much, but this one was just too good. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 20:41, Feb. 6, 2008 For     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   15:24, Friday 08 February 2008   For now that the PLS has ended. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 07:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC) For as per wehp. --THE 07:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC) For well, yeah...it's good. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) Dig Now, I can vote in favor. --THINKER 14:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Go forth unto ye olde mayne payge - Well written with some great ideas behind the links (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 12, 20:17 For now that the PLS is over. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	Against Yeah, it's a good read, but it doesn't do it for me. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:17, Feb. 5, 2008
Comments	This should not be nom'd until after PLS has officially concluded. Same with all other participant articles. --THINKER 15:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC) It doesn't matter. -- remarkable Ape (plagiarize) (Riot Porn) 22:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Um, it does matter, because I said it did. --THINKER 14:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Yeah, so put that in your Thursday and Friday it like it's 1999!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---