From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: HowTo:Become Stupid in 21 days
|
Score: 12 self-inflicted brickings
|
| Nominated by:
|
MrN  19:35, Apr 3 19:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 18
|
- Non+4 I think this is not bad at all for a first article. What do you think? MrN 19:35, Apr 3
- For What the bold text says. - 10:40 3 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
- F♥r. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 21:54 Apr 3
- FOR This is a very silly article! YAY!!!--Moonzeppelin MUN 00:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- For Le Cejak • <Apr 04, 2008 [2:52]>
- For And again; something else I've peed on making it to VFH. Also it is a pretty wonderful article.--orian57 03:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Self For Might as well add shame to the list of qualities I lack. --OptyC Sucks!
 CUN 20:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- For. I like it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:45, Apr 4
- For • nyp 08:52, Sunday 06 April 2008
- Fizzor foshizzor Pure poetry ;). Jesus Hates You. 22:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Reviewed and FOR! As the person who reviewed this article, I am pleased to see it nominated for the front page, and vote FOR it. Warm Regards, Javascap
- Hell yeah! This article is awesome, well done and good luck on the rest of your content - oh look, it's Madmikeuk ~ { talk - contrib } 17:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 For. Robertodole 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)- very weak for VGD >=3 20:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- For --The Improver talk • contribs • 02:37, Apr 17 2008 (UTC)
- For --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  20:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 01:52, Apr. 23, 2008
- For. - --Sycamore (Talk) 11:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Against after the first few, I definitely wasn't inspired to continue reading. --THINKER 17:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against Do something original. -RAHB 21:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- It was alright but Yo Mamma jokes tend to make me cringe. The concept seems a bit warn out but you made good out of a rag, just not FA good. Conditional Against --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     14:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against, it was alright, much more so for a first article, but a bit too repetitive and condescending for my taste. –—Hv (talk) 15/04 20:39
- Eh pretty average, nothing clever --Moneke 09:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against -->:( 03:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
All the references aboot the person called "Your Mom" made this article--Moonzeppelin MUN 00:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- No... they didn't. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Vote rigs teh awesome nom, for great feature Robertodole 01:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Um, are you accusing me of vote rigging? -OptyC Sucks! CUN 17:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, I was saying that I want to vote rig it so that it gets nommed O:-) Robertodole 18:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Fight! Fight! Fight! -RAHB 08:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose, just let me slip on these oversized {RANDOMSUPERHERO} Power Fists first. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:44, 17 Apr
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
19:35, Apr 3 19:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
For. 
