Forum:So, should we unban Kip the Dip?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > So, should we unban Kip the Dip?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5749 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

The answer to that is "yes", actually. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:59 Apr 14, 2008

No. Kippy and I came to an agreement on his ban length. At the time of his current ban (not the ban that he had to be unbanned from so he could have his current ban), he was perfectly all right with serving the entire time of his ban, and I, for one, believe that we should support him. In staying banned. For as long as possible. -- The Zombiebaron 20:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

So: He was unbanned from a ban to be banned into a new ban, and the ban he was unbanned from wasn't the ban he's now being banned with, but he argued the ban to become unbanned to get re-banned, so that he might not be infinibanned? My brain is bleeding. I think I need a bandage. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:07 Apr 14, 2008

Yes? -- The Zombiebaron 20:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the correct answer is "C". So sorry. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:10 Apr 14, 2008

“Yes?”

~ User:Zombiebaron on Forum:So, should we unban Kip the Dip?

I rest my case. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:11 Apr 14, 2008

My "Yes" my say "Yes", but my "?" says "No". -- The Zombiebaron 16:23, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

What does the "." say? That you aren't pregnant?--<<>> 23:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes? -- The Zombiebaron 23:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes!--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

YES!!!-- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 07:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes. sirsysrq @ 18:19 Apr 16

Yes. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 18:40, 16 Apr 2008

Yes. Oh, and congratulations Zombiebaron or whoever is responsible for this. You just used the Incompleteness Theorem to trick a bunch of people into voting yes. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Does that mean I should say "Don't stop!" now? -- The Zombiebaron 23:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

!sdrawkcab og dluohs ew ebyam rO !yalP | !ngiS | !eM pleH | !klaT | E= iesnes-ihsanotoK ikihssI 14:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have no idea what is being voted on here any more, but if anyone cares, I think we should welcome Kip back. Although some of his dickery did piss some people off, he actually made me almost piss myself laughing with a few of his antics. I say get him back, but obviously put some limitations on his actions via the office. MrN 19:18, Apr 17

There's no way the Office could control him, even if they were to do something drastic like "no voting/talk paging/forum-ing" to contain him. He's just too much of a dick. I think he needs to just do something else. sirsysrq @ 20:29 Apr 17

Uh, he never really was much of a dick, if I remember correctly. Never said anything dick-y to me, at least. I think he just always managed to say/do the wrong thing at the wrong time. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:56, Apr 17

THIS IS THE DRAMA LINE

---

No drama allowed beyond this point. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:58 Apr 17, 2008

FU DRA SKULBUMPER I HATE HAET HAT U!!!!111111111111111111 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:12, Apr 17

OMGNOWAHPLZDONTBANMEH – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:13 Apr 17, 2008

OMGSKULHUMPERURMAKINMAHSOHAWTINEDSUMWATAH!!!!!1!1!1111eleventy --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

lol pwnt – Preceding unsigned comment added by Syndrome (talk • contribs)

!amard sekil I ...tuB !yalP | !ngiS | !eM pleH | !klaT | E= iesnes-ihsanotoK ikihssI 18:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, my sdrawkcab sig is breaking! VGD >=3 18:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)