Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old: Difference between revisions

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>AM088
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 142: Line 142:
 
{|{{purtytable}}
  
{|{{purtytable}}
 
||'''Keep'''||
  
||'''Keep'''||
−
*Sure, it's a stub...but it's not crap.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 13:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 +
*Sure, it's a stub...but it's not crap.--[[User:Modusoperandi/sig|Sir Crap]] 13:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 
|-
  
|-
 
||'''Delete'''||
  
||'''Delete'''||
 
*'''How''' does this crap survive for so long? --[[User:Anyone|Anyone]] 02:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  
*'''How''' does this crap survive for so long? --[[User:Anyone|Anyone]] 02:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  +
*Just so Modusoperandi, or whatever his name is knows, this is '''crappy, crappy, crap crap crap, covered in crap, coated in crap, and then sprinkled with little bits of crap, then eaten and crapped out'''. That's what ''this'' article is. --{{User:Electrified mocha chinchilla/sig}} 00:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 
|-
  
|-
 
||'''Comments'''||
  
||'''Comments'''||

Revision as of 00:36, 13 October 2006

Sub pages:

Rules and procedures:

  1. Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
    1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    2. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    3. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    4. Abusers of the policy will be abused themselves. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Place {{vfd}} at the top of the page you would like to add to VFD. Unmarked articles will be removed from VFD without prejudice.
    2. Create a new section for your nominated article.
      1. New entries on top.
      2. Every article must be given a section of its own; if you are putting 10 related articles up, every single one should be given a section of its own.
      3. Edit the Pages for Deletion section below and carefully follow the (currently hidden) instructions you see there. If you screw it up, you will probably get banned.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No, really, thank you very much.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
      1. * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. If you are not an administrator or the designated {{poopsmith}}, do not remove anything from VFD, doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy.
Edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


The fall of Rome

Keep
Delete
  • Delete it. It sucks. --EMC [TALK] 16:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. Really big arbitrary numbers should be grounds for QVFD no matter what. --Anyone 20:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Other ways humans are just icky

Keep
Delete
  • This is an incoherent piece of crap. Terminate. --Onion 16:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, that page is all over the place. Focus, people. Focus!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this thing please. --EMC [TALK] 16:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Rubbish -- Hindleyite 18:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No don't not delete it. --Anyone 20:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Monster

Keep
Delete
  • Nuke. The article consists of unfunny sexual references followed by a huge list. --Onion 15:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Monsters and Anal Rape in holy matrimony. --Anyone 20:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dysfunctional Families

Keep
  • Good start, has potential. Needs work, not kill on sight. - David Gerard 20:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Kill. This is the epitome of bad satire. --Onion 14:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Politico-cultural ax grinding in a totally unfunny way. --WheelMan 18:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • meh. Almost a year old = this trash isn't going to get any better. I'd rather someone start over with a fresh idea than be tainted by this crap. --Anyone 20:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

LithiYum!

Keep
Delete

Crap, thrown together by IPs.--Theo 03:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Multiple heads arn't always better than one, especially when those heads are attached to idiots. --Anyone 13:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Malaclypse the Younger

Keep
Delete
  • wtf? Dumbness masquerading as humour. --Anyone 02:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • agreed.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's coherent Discordian in-jokes. Pity it's completely unoriginal - David Gerard 20:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No. --EMC [TALK] 20:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not an adequate article for the topic. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 20:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Jewish-Palestinian Pact

Keep
  • Sure, para 1 is awful. The rest isn't crap. Plus Juslim sounds funny.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Bunco

Keep
  • Sure, it's a stub...but it's not crap.--Sir Crap 13:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • How does this crap survive for so long? --Anyone 02:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just so Modusoperandi, or whatever his name is knows, this is crappy, crappy, crap crap crap, covered in crap, coated in crap, and then sprinkled with little bits of crap, then eaten and crapped out. That's what this article is. --EMC [TALK] 00:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Crunk

Keep
Delete

Cleaning Out The Crap--Theo 01:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Stoopid Pointless, random, crappy. --Anyone 01:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Sounds like it's make a pretty cool energy drink, but a horrible article. Bye-bye. --EMC [TALK] 20:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

QWNED

Keep
Delete
  • Found this on the recent changes. It is bad. --The Zombiebaron 22:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's more than bad. It's totally unnecessary. And bad.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Obviously that letter is entirely fake, as we all know George Bush signs his letters with "G Bizzle."--Anyone 01:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Navy

Keep
Delete
  • Ugly Stubbins--Theo 21:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wasn't Ugly Stubbins a blues guitarist? Oh, and delete.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Dod Gammit. Im sick of gay-related navy jokes! Men of Sea (read:Seamen) are not to be taken lightly! --Anyone 01:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Roh Moo-hyun

Keep
Delete
  • Doo-doo.--The One and Only Czar Yah 20:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Undeserving of an NRV if you ask me; more like a QVFD. But we can do it this way too if you want. --Anyone 20:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • <cough> You did notice the NRV that's a mere 17 hours old, right?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I noticed Czar put it up here anyway, but to me it doesn't deserve a NRV, it deserves a quick and merciless death. The topic is going nowhere(where can it go?), the author has abandoned it, and he/she was never going to make anything out of it. Also, you might want to get that cough checked out, it sounds bad. --Anyone 01:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
    • I used to yell at people for doing that kind of crap here in the past. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 20:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Drew Barrymore

Keep
Delete
  • Booo. It starts out innocent enough (innocent, yet still crappy) but then it crosses over into the land of "pink asses" and "defacation," which is a land few wish to enter. --Anyone 20:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Commander of the IDF?! WTF? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il.png GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 20:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • At least she's not commander of the IDF until 2022. That's something, I guess.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • She could do better than General Halutz if she weren't also a pink rabbit.---Asteroid B612B612.jpg (aka Rataube) - Ñ 21:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Barrymore-a Assahola. --Hhamdy283 22:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Someone didn't read HTBFANJS.
Comments

Serious Cybernetics Corporation

Keep
Delete
  • ahh. The cool, refreshing taste of cliche. --Anyone 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kind of maybe promising, but no.--The One and Only Czar Yah 20:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Tastes like "Tab". Blech!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I stopped reading it seriously after the Steve Ballmer bit. -- Hindleyite 20:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. Wow, a failed attempt at a Hitchhiker's Guide reference.
Comments

Post-it note

Keep
Delete
  • Lame like a duck...a duck that is lame. (in case there was any confusion) --Anyone 19:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That's some random thing they've got. There. I think this page just ate 10 IQ points...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • A disgrace to random humour. -- Hindleyite 20:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I read the first line. I daren't read the rest. --Hhamdy283 22:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Keep
Delete
  • teh ghey. Literally...that man is NEARLY NAKED. --Anyone 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Die die die. Al Gore jokes? Is it 1998 again?--Procopius 20:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Erm, nope (Thumbs up).-- Hindleyite 20:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Should send the writer back to 1998. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il.png GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 20:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. First line-good start. The rest makes my sad. --Hhamdy283 22:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Execution

Keep
Delete
Comments

Mr Jihad

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hardcore kids

Keep
  • Keep - I coulda written this. Of course, I'd have written it better - David Gerard 20:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Note: I have reverted it to an earlier, longer revision for reassessment. -- Hindleyite 16:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Angela Keslar

Keep
  • Keep -- We can rebuild it. Go look at About Angela Keslar and tell me this woman is not a fit subject for Uncyc. Shit, if Angela wrote that page she could write for Uncyc and beat 95% of us at our own game. ----OEJ 19:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment:None of those arguments serve as very good justification for keeping the article that we currently have. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 14:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Away With It! Half vanity, half unfunny drivel about some fashion designer I never heard of. MAYBE Codeine's Mum has heard of her. Maybe she likes fashion... But I don't recall gowns being a source of riproaring comedy. My pants and their contents? Maybe. --Theo 21:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf? Dumb, random "facts", and crappy. --Anyone 14:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Shoot with a handgun. -- Hindleyite 17:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. This is about as funny as my pants, except my pants are funnier. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us.png MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Headbanging

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. As a person who headbangs on a regular basis, this offends me. --Hhamdy283 04:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Most articles hurt me, this is no exceptions. I'm going to read hammer now, and laugh. --Theo 15:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sigh. I ask you, was the bolding really necessary? --Anyone 15:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Blow it the hell up. I think I'm going to headbang now. The real kind. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us.png MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No thanks--Theo 21:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Bjørnar Pettersen

Keep
Delete
  • Stinks of vanity and suck. What do you guys think? —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)21:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill eeet! I had it on qvfd under the thought that Codeine's Mom wasn't it's friend. All hail Codeine's Mum!--Theo 21:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hanging's too good for 'em. -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 21:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Damnit. He just changed Chuck Norris facts to "Bjornar Pettersen" facts, and Chuck Norris Facts are just old Vin Diesel facts, and Vin Diesel Facts all came from Bill Brasky (TO BILL BRASKY!) --Anyone 14:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Who knew that Benson had family in Europe?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • (Grumbles) -- Hindleyite 17:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bill Brasky once ate an entire Vietnamese village on a dare. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us.png MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.----OEJ 19:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ottawa

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Fucking lame. I live in the sonnabitch and I don't find anything here funny. --Hhamdy283 03:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. I don't understand how people can create random bullshit and call it humour. --Anyone 15:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. That's what some people seem to think Uncyc is about. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us.png MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 17:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Could the first paragraph be any more random? Could the rest be less bad? and just what the hell is an Ottawa, anyway?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and nominate Hhamdy283 to write an Ottawa that sucketh not the bratwurst.----OEJ 19:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I'll get around to writing a new version of this soon. I write a lot better when I'm sleep deprived. --Hhamdy283 22:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Hide and Creep

Keep
  • hmm. I never saw the movie, but the article atleast has time put into it; as it's not complete bullshit. I don't think it should be VFD'd yet. --Anyone 15:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Jay

Keep
  • Keep. I kind of like it. Should be extended though. --Icons-flag-us.png SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • UNDER CONSTRUCTION: In the middle of making funny. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Not only is it not funny, it's not even our joke that's being not funny - David Gerard 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Be original or go home. --Onion 02:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Buggrit, millenium hand and shrimp. This article sucks. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us.png MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I'm not seeing sufficient funny here. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke.gif 19:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I liked it when I first wrote it, but then again, I was an IP back then. Then again, someone added something... then again, it didn't match the tone of the stub... gah, can't decide. Either build on it or smash it. --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 03:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Final_Fantasy_XI

Keep

  • I don't see anything wrong with it, but if the original author doesn't finish it, then it will go a direction he doesn't want it to. You don't like it, fix it. --epynephrin 21:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I see no problem either. --AM088 22:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Delete

  • "Articles that will never be good unless the original author finishes them." As the original author, this article has become progessively more awful since it's first creation [1]. Kill it. Kill it now. --User:Ihavenolife


A1 Racing

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Unreadable crap. --AM088 22:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Archived VFD Discussions

Archived Votes:

01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10
11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20
21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30
31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40
41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 (current)

Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/old&oldid=1148050"