Why? talk:Did I just read Twilight?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

QFT! W1k13rh3nry 21:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Funneh, but moar lulz plz.[edit source]

I feel a need to review this article, because I feel like this could be pretty amazing if it were completed. Please set up a review page (or let me know if there already is one, I'm too lazy to go check) and I'll review it. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 14:36 Nov 5







COZ ITS AMAZING :)

Actually this was pretty good! Did you do something with this Sissy? Or was it this good without you? There was a few lines towards the end that need a little re-wording just so it sounds better but other than that it's probably nomable and I havent even read teh book. Sir Orian57~Christmas!~Talk Sc santa hat for signs.jpg 21:32 22 December 2008
It already got nommed once. I'm not sure if it lost, or ran out of time, but if memory serves me correctly, I think people had a problem with its length. Somebody should work on it... The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 22:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
No, just lots of Die-hard Twilight IPs voting against it, or maybe not, I don't really remember, nor do I feel the need to take 30 seconds to look it up. Go ahead and add to it if you want, I don't care as long as its not more "Twilight is awesome and Sonic80 is a retard for writing this and gets his kicks from whacking it to men. (Thats not true, ladies.) Icons-flag-pi.PNG Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 23:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)