User talk:Webgeek111
Welcome![edit source]
Hello, Webgeek111, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:
If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
- Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}}
to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Again, welcome! ----The Zombiebaron 18:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Hiya[edit source]
User:AyumiKitada recently came to me regarding your vandalism of her userpage a few days ago, asking me to ban you. I don't know if you knew this or not, but seeing as you're very new here (and there is a notice on her userpage inviting vandalism) this isn't resulting in a ban. Anyhow, vandalism of other people's pages in any shape or form is BAD, but seeing as she did vandalise yours in return... yeah, I'm just gonna revert and keep out of this one. Try and keep out of each other's way in future, yeah? -- 11:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit source]
You've been vandalizing my UnNews articles quite a bit as well. You're heading for a ban really fast. --Composure1 18:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Owned[edit source]
Your getting owned by Braydie reverting your edits
warning[edit source]
I've checked out your contribs and your history of vandalising. I've noticed that you make seemingly random changes to words here and there which do nothing to "improve" the article whatsoever. Other users are getting irritated with this behaviour.If you cross my sights again, you're betting blocked. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 23:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Unnews[edit source]
I too did not like what you did to my UnNews article, UnNews:Humans “to blame” for climate change and I see that some nice people have reverted some of the damage you caused to other things I have contributed. I don't mind edits to improve flow, witty additional one liners etc. but wholesale revision that converts something that was sort of funny into something that is downright stooopid really pisses me off. I try and avoid reverting, because this is a world where we all work together, but it seems to me you are treading on quite a few toes... --Zeeboy 09:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
UGotM[edit source]
Congratulations on being nominated for Useless Gobshite of the Month! If you don't want this award, I suggest you straighten up your act real fast, otherwise you'll be looking at a ban that will last a really long time. -- 23:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Or you can feel honored. Insineratehymn's very own god wants the award. Insineratehymn must have been made in your likeness as well. 01:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Let me point out that Insineratehymn is in no position to threaten you with infinite bans. I however am in a position to threaten to ban you for "a long time". --The Zombiebaron 03:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
ICU[edit source]
Recently an important decision was made by some admins regarding this template without consulting any Uncyclopedians. I'd like to get the opinion of a few other people. Please see here. Quadzilla99 03:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)