User:Shabidoo/happymonkeycompetition/2012/Magic man
Pee reviews for: Magic man
Article: Mariachi Band
Pee Review from Shabidoo
Creativity: | 10/10 |
A big wide steaming 10 for creativity. I'm impressed by how you added many different touches by: making it a question and answer session, having three different characters, having the characters dialogue in different colours, that the different colours represents the mexican flag, the play on large mexican families, the use of a white guy trying to be mexican, and using three very different images well. And you did all of this in 36 hours. Well well well done magic man. I wouldn't have a clue what more to add here in the creativity section. |
Originality: | 6/10 |
This article is also very original (as per all the above mentioned ideas). It was one of the more unique articles in the competition. That being said, you address the topic of Mariachi bands in a very literal way throughout the article and you don't really touch much on the very thing itself: "what is a mariachi band"? "why do they wear a tight flamboyant suit"? "Do mexicans even like the music"? "How often does this music get mystaken for Spanish music"? "why is there so little variation in the songs"? "is a mustache obligatory to be in a band"? etc. And there is also the possibility to take the article places that would really surprise the reader. Consider linking Mariachi bands even closer to the size of a large family. For example:
To wrap this section up...it is very very creative, but I would suggest, as always, when going over your article, to ask yourself, can I take this article to a totally different place while still keeping it as an essential part of the article with continuity? I'm sure that in this article you can. |
Cleverness: | 7/10 |
As per above, there is so much clever about this, mostly mentioned in the creativity section. What I found most clever (aside from the formatting) was the "large family" theme. You use it several times, parodying the large size of a Mexican family and the smaller size of white families (their a handful). Also, the joke about hiring the white guy was funny, though I would suggest finding a more relevant way for the previous guy to have died, a fire seems sort of random. Ideas:
Little parts of the article I thought were funny:
Parts where the jokes crossed the cheesy line for me:
|
Content and Images: | 6/10 |
As per the narrative, I think it is really well written. Its done in your always laid back but humerous style. Theres always a whiff of cheese in your lines, but you always shamelessly write it so well, I find myself laughing at a style of writing I would otherwise not find funny. As per the images, the first two fit in quite well. The third one is not bad, though maybe a little expected (the flamboyant artist who is an office worker by day). Consider adding an extra dimention of humour into the third picture by giving him an equally flamboyant day job but making it seem like a serious one. The last image made me laugh. I think some readers will find it a little fluffy and out of sync with the other images in the article, but I like it and it fits in with who you are as a writer. |
Points for whatever reason: | 10/10 |
A full ten points for a very admirable attempt. You clearly put a lot of work in such short time both concieving the article, working on several clever and complex jokes, the formatting and other very creative ideas. |
Final Score: | 39/50 |
No doubt you will expand the article just a little more and perhaps adjust the images and polish it up and it will be featured in no time. Thanks for putting heart and sole into the article during this years competition. It wouldn't have been the same without your very creative and unique writing style! |
Comments: |
Score and Comments from Wilytank[edit | edit source]
6/10
Score and Comments from PopGoesTheWeasel[edit | edit source]
8.5/10
I liked it, kind of a feel-good article! I think the color thing to distinguish the persons is a great idea. Clever jokes too! Mattsnow 17:43, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
Score and Comments from Mattsnow[edit | edit source]
7.5/10
Score and Comments from Joe9320[edit | edit source]
8/10
Score and Comments from Chief[edit | edit source]
7/10
An interesting concept and a generally pleasing result. The fluency is hampered in places by some slightly confusing dialogue choices and the use of greyish white for one of the characters; this made my eyes hurt. Despite my bleeding eyes it was a pretty good read.
Final Score[edit | edit source]
76/100