User:PF4Eva/Facebook hates big butts, cannot lie, removes innocent photo
|This article is part of UnNews, your source for up-to-the-picosecond misinformation.|
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Cute, innocent, harmless, and legal, right? Not so, says
Farcebook Facebook. The social networking fascists ordered a North Carolina mom to remove a photo of her 2-year-old daughter getting the Coppertone treatment, claiming it violates their policy on pornography and nudity.
Now, I like big butts* (*of people who have been of legal age for at least a month) (and I cannot lie) as much as the next person, but come on, man! There is nothing sexual or suggestive in the "controversial" photo. You don't see a yellow smiley face over my bare ass when I take a shower! [TMI - Ed.] Hello, no! My black rump is out in the open like Julie Andrews in The Sound of Music.
THE HIIIIILLLLS ARE ALIIIIIIIVE WITH THE SOUND OF MUUUUUSIIIIIIIC!!!!
Come on, man! It was acceptable back in 1953, but it ain't acceptable now, with the pedophiles and perverts and whatnot? Why has the world become so PC since 9/11? Bring it back to the 90s, man. Back when the only thing people feared were Barney, the Power Rangers, the Spice Girls, and the Macarena. Back when it was okay for the President to get some back.
Nowadays, everybody's too serious and easily offended. What happened, man? What else y'all gonna censor?
Marilyn Monroe's famous skirt scene from The Seven Year Itch?
Donald Duck's bare, pant-less ass?
I think I've made my point, home skillets. There was no harm done. Bring the photo back in its original, uncensored state.
Sources[edit | edit source]
- Ben Dover "North Carolina mom battles Facebook over child photo meant to depict Coppertone pose" Faux News, July 7, 2014
- Seymour Butts "Sir Mix-A-Lot performs "Baby Got Back" with Seattle Symphony" USA Today, June 9, 2014