Uncyclopedia talk:Anniversaries
Right. Waffle over. Hope this works... --Machinecurse 18:56, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Moved style guide to main page. --Algorithm 19:01, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)
You're welcome for the great idea. Ungrateful bastards. :P --Savethemooses 20:54, 5 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I don't really like the going past the present day so much.[edit source]
Most entries dated after 2007 are really sucky and uncreative, and I would like to know who opposes the idea of me deleting all but the most appropriate entries after '07.
Some apocolypse ones, the All your base, and a few others I would let stay, but really, I want to purge the future events because most aren't funny.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Today's main page screwed up[edit source]
by a really long scream (AAAAAHHHHH etc.) in the anniversaries, and it doesn't seem I can fix it. So besides trying to raise awareness of this, I'm wondering if there is currently a system for an admin to approve a date's anniversaries before they become "locked" into today, or what…? — Lenoxus 00:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC) Never mind, it seems I was impatient. — Lenoxus 00:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah sorry about that, that came from me editing the new article on the main page. Seems I touched something that I wasn't supposed to. —Braydie 00:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Al Gore[edit source]
can we make it that if Al Gore invents something, that thing has to invent him first (preferably around 3000 bc)? "Imnotanewb 18:11, June 24, 2011 (UTC)"
This thang[edit source]
This thing is mediocre. You We need to do something about it. — Jan 31 2013 00:31.