Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:RedHot/McDonalds
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User:RedHot/McDonalds[edit source]
A work in process, I'm trying to combine the iconicness of it with blind praise. Need advice.
RedHot (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Put some pics in. --IFYMB! 10:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- What he said. Also somebody should actually review this. I would but it's 9:15pm and I'm half asleep to the point I'm surrounded by talking catfish... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Humour: | 6 | This is quite good for a first article, and certainly better than our current McDonald's article. I think you're on the right track, but I still have a few pointers to make.
|
Concept: | 6 | The subject of McDonald's has a wealth of potential for a good article, though it may be a challenge to come up with something amazingly original from it. |
Prose and formatting: | 4 | Ok, this is probably the article's weak point.
|
Images: | 2 | What everyone said above. Needs images. Gave you a 2 because I'm nice and you're still working on this and it's easy to fix. But yeah. Needs images. |
Miscellaneous: | 5 | Averaged all your scores and added 0.5 because I felt like it. |
Final Score: | 23 | So, to sum up everything I said: Don't let 'stating the opposite' humour dominate too much, try to keep a consistent style throughout the article, proofread your article thoroughly, add images and links. Overall it's good so far, so keep working at it. Hope that helped in some small way, and hope that you stick around to write more! |
Reviewer: | --Snippy 10:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |