Template talk:Talkheader
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Talkheader. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
||
please mguys be mre careful with CSS values: class="messagebox standard talk" didn't existed here, I had to cpy it from wikipedia(R) --201.230.0.83 19:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Does this template really have a value[edit source]
Discussion on this template is going on in the Village dump . Forum:Why do we need a Talk Page Header? Dame 
GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Brief opinion on that[edit source]
The amount of crap and spamming shit that goes on is an annoying on article talkpages. We ideally want constuctive comments rather than some bitching IPs/slutlist spamming cunts etc. I don't have a problem with a template that gives links and guidence to noobs and so forth. I really fail to see why a limiting response is/was needed. I have used it on a number of my articles and I believe its not a solution to the loitering/arsehole behaivior, but its some measure to stop what is one of the single most annoying practices on here.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- My comments are very relevant and constructive. Thank you very much. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Too nasty! I think.
"What you did last night" links to Your mom!
User:Jehovah's Wittiness 02:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Woohoo! —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Image subpage[edit source]
Most of the time there's nothing to see, so why is it linked to? I'm thinking the link should be removed but maybe it should say something about creating one. Or do we do that these days? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:56, 18 Feb 2014