Talk:Caddyshack conspiracy

From Pee Review[edit source]

My first article. need some help. Thank you. GopherKiller Questions? Comments?

Humour:	5	I found one thing funny, everything else was just a setup that never went anywhere. What I mean by that is that you seem to be setting up for a gargantuan punchline at the end of the long dry spells without any laughs, and you never get there. It's a shaggy dog story of sorts.
Concept:	5	It's strange, but has potential.
Prose and formatting:	8	Well written, though a few grammatical corrections would help.
Images:	7	Meh, relevant enough. I can't really see any way to improve them, but images aren't really my bag.
Miscellaneous:	4	If you're going to do this bizarre yet potentially hilarious topic, you're going to have to keep a few things in mind. One: try to keep the setups to your jokes at maximum three sentences. The Second Conspiracy section could use a bit of work too. Try adding some more jokes in there. The article itself is also too short. Try adding a "Well-known Conspiracy Theorists" section, and also the last refuge of those trying to make it longer, a "See Also" section.
Final Score:	29	Good luck.
Reviewer:	Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)