Forum:The real Benson for admin

Forums: Index > BHOP > The real Benson for admin

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6132 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I just want to know, should Benson (the real one; not the imposter, mind you) become an admin? --AAA! (AAAA) 12:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey! We already had a vote like this for the real Benson! Forum:Benson for Admin (The real Deal) --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Should Benson become an admin?

Please vote below. Results will be shown when you have voted.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.

1 YES!!!

2 no

3 Maybe

4 Who's Benson?

5 Don't know, don't care

6 Can we have him for a hatstand instead?

There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 17:19, 7 April 2013.

poll-id 273C1A371B62BD7413FF5AE15727DB19

ADMIN IS NOT ENOUGH FOR BENSON

BENSON NEEDS MORE THAN ADMINMINSHIP. I PURPOSE A NEW POSTION AND MORE DESERVING POSITION:THE BENSON OF UNCYCLOPEDIA! WILL HAVE ALL THE SAME POWER THEN ADMIN BUT BETTER! WHY? BECAUSE HE IS BENSON! HE WILL BE ADDRESSED AS "LORD" JUST LIKE ADMINS ARE ADDRESSED "SIR'S"! THIS NEW POSTION WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSIBILITIES:

• BAN USERS WHO DO NOT FOLLOW BENSON PROPERLY
  
• BAN AND DEPOWER ALL ADMINS WHO BLOCKED BENSON
  
• CREATE SOCKPUPPETS FOR ANY REASON
  
• BAN VANDALS
  
• UNBLOCK HIMSELF

THE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE:

• THE REAL BENSON!

--Scott 14:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

LORD ISN'T AWESOME ENOUGH. HE SHOULD SIMPLY HAVE "BENSON" STATUS, WHICH IS EVEN BETTER THAN SYSOP, BUREAUCRAT, AND LORD COMBINED! --User:Nintendorulez 21:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE BENSON. HOW CAN ANYONE ELSE HAVE THE TITLE? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

NOBODY ELSE WOULD GET THE TITLE. JUST BENSON. MAYBE THERE COULD BE A SECOND-IN-BENSON TITLE FOR HIS MOST FAITHFUL BELEAVER AND SECOND PROPHET... --User:Nintendorulez 21:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

YOU FORGOT STAFF. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

THOSE SEEM GOOD TO ME. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 22:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Briggs Inc. for BENSON of Uncyclopedia status

Although I have made some unwise choices in the past, I can assure you that they were for humor and humor alone. I hope that if appointed BENSON of Uncyclopedia I will be a fair but firm leader.

Score: -4

• AGAINST - ONLY BENSON SHOULD BE BENSON. --User:Nintendorulez 18:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - How about Benson's assistant? --AAA! (AAAA) 03:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• AGAINST THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE BENSON. --General Insineratehymn 18:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST. THERE IS ONLY ONE BENSON. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST THERE IS BUT A SINGLE BENSON IN THIS PUNY UNIVERSE. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 21:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• COMMENT By the way Mr. Briggs, you wouldn't want to lose THIS again, would you? --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 21:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  

  If Mr. Briggs tried to be BENSON, who knows what might happen to this...

• COMMENT OH SNAP! --User:Nintendorulez 21:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Well does BENSON need an assistant? Is there maybe a page program? Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC) EH?

• NO. BENSON NEEDS NO HELP OR ASSISTANCE OF ANY KIND. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• AGAINST-THERE IS ONLY ONE BENSON! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! WHEN BENSON BENSONCRAT HE WILL BAN YOU FOR TRYING TO BE AN IMPOSTOR OF HIM!--Scott 21:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BENSONCRAT, EH? I LIKE THE SOUND OF THAT NAME. --User:Nintendorulez 22:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON FOR BENSONCRAT

Score: 0

SEE MY POST ABOVE FOR DETAILS. HE SHOULD BENSONCRAT BECAUSE HE IS BENSON!!!--Scott 03:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

If he is BENSONCRAT, can I be the BENSON OF- er... of Uncyclopedia now? Mr. Briggs Inc. 13:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?

NO. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --User:Nintendorulez 17:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --User:Nintendorulez 21:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Again just for good measure.

NO. --General Insineratehymn 21:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

.....Can I at least be an admin? Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?

NO. --User:Nintendorulez 23:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --User:Nintendorulez 21:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --General Insineratehymn 01:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

NO. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Cool. Mr. Briggs Inc. 02:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?

NO. --User:Nintendorulez 00:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)