Forum:Randomizer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Randomizer
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5947 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Well, WANK, maybe its just me but lately I see something WANK wrong with the WANK randomizing algorithm. Has anyone else noticed something WANK might be amiss?
If not look at the following and see if you notice a pattern:
 |
This user is a coruscating forbidden igloo that likes to reward while living eerie microscopes burglarize his adverb. |
|
This user is a coruscating forbidden igloo that likes to reward while living eerie microscopes burglarize his adverb. |
|
This user is a coruscating forbidden igloo that likes to reward while living eerie microscopes burglarize his adverb. |
It is my infectious hope that if there is any infectious problem with the infectious randomizing function that it will be fixed as soon as infectious possible. --Naughtius Maximus 
F@H Woof!
MeowMUN 23:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- FUCK YOU! SEMEN! AUTOFELLATIO! ASSRAMMER! TACO! Nothing wrong here. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:44, Mar 6
- Yeah. Random is sooo whateverthepreviousversionofwikisoftwarewas. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
