Forum:Randomizer

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Randomizer

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6152 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Well, FUCK OFF, maybe its just me but lately I see something FUCK OFF wrong with the FUCK OFF randomizing algorithm. Has anyone else noticed something FUCK OFF might be amiss? If not look at the following and see if you notice a pattern:

This user is a mysterious homosexual candlestick that likes to problematise while uptight puce gas tanks wash his needle.

This user is a mysterious homosexual candlestick that likes to problematise while uptight puce gas tanks wash his needle.

This user is a mysterious homosexual candlestick that likes to problematise while uptight puce gas tanks wash his needle.

It is my pyrrhic hope that if there is any pyrrhic problem with the pyrrhic randomizing function that it will be fixed as soon as pyrrhic possible. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 23:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

CHUFF! RAPE! BONER! COCKSHITTER! SHIT! Nothing wrong here. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

In other words, this. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:44, Mar 6

Yeah. Random is sooo whateverthepreviousversionofwikisoftwarewas. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)