From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Walpurgis Night
|
Score: 12
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir Shandon  (Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
- Nom & For: clean, easy on the eyes, good writing, worthy of front page. And encyclopedia-style! Go! Go! Go!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)- More virgins sacrificed to the corporate whore. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- For --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  19:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- For MrN
 01:04, Aug 5
- For Sir Severian
  (Sprich mit mir!) 
- For - Even the first quote made me laugh, brilliantly written too
 (Bonner) (Talk) Aug 5, 22:15
- For. --
 Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- For. Yeah, I like this. --UU - natter
 08:59, Aug 6
- Yeah, looks a fair bit better. Nice work. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:34, Aug 7
- Sure thing. --
 Jack Phoenix, professional killer admin (Whine?) • (Wikia ♥ ads) 21:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's good. - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 21:54, Aug 7
- I like it! Great layout, great photos, great writing! -
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  21:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- How did I miss this? For --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
    09:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 2
|
- Against Yeah, it looks encyclopedic and all, but unfortunately it's just about as funny. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN21:51, 6 Aug
- Against - On second though, if I don't get this then the chances are some passing random person won't either. Sorry. -- shimmery Ape (optimise) (Riot Porn) 21:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- abstain. over my head. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but
 abs. I really want to vote for this, because especially towards the end it gets very good, but, like Gerry said, the opening seemed a bit weak and overmyhead-y. Touch up the prose a bit(I've edited it some already, hopefully making it better and not worse), and try to make the first 2 sections a bit more accessible, and I'll gladly change to a for vote. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:42, Aug 6
- Thanks Led Balloon for having a look though it and to RDB as well;) I've opened out the first section and tided the first two parts up = obviously I've tried to keep the good stuff though. Because the article runs historically the sections that deal with more present day events/ideas are going to seem a lot more relevant, and as such, will seem more obviously funny.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
*Abstain - didn't get it. I'm assuming the issue is with me. -- shimmery Ape (optimise) (Riot Porn) 20:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
For.--
abs. I really want to vote for this, because especially towards the end it gets very good, but, like Gerry said, the opening seemed a bit weak and overmyhead-y. Touch up the prose a bit(I've edited it some already, hopefully making it better and not worse), and try to make the first 2 sections a bit more accessible, and I'll gladly change to a for vote. - 
