From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Uncyclopedia! Answers
|
Score: 1 answers
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir Peasewhizz Biblio HOS Awards 02:37 3.18.13
|
For: 3
|
- N+F - Sir Peasewhizz Biblio HOS Awards 02:37 3.18.13
 For. Very funny and original, although I agree with The Woodburninator that it leaves the reader wanting more (then again, that is what good comedy does; bad comedy does not "know when to stop" and wears a joke out - it can be a fine line as to how much is just enough). I do wish the entries/questions/comments were not so small and were easier to read; I can see how trying to look at the article on a smart phone and appreciate it would be tough. Sir NoNamesLeft (GUN) WotM NotM 00:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:11, 23 March 2013
|
Against: 2
|
- This is a tough one because the concept is there. It looks good. It makes you want more. The problem I see with it is that you never get any more. Unless I'm doing something wrong (and since I'm reading and editing on my phone, that is a very good possibility) the links that I want to click on to see more are just images. It is really underwhelming. But there is sooooo much possibility in this if someone could format it do that it both looks good, and allows for links and depth where now there are just image files. The Woodburninator
 Minimal Effort ™ 05:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 Limp boner. Ordinarily I wouldn't nail an otherwise funny article on the basis of formatting alone, but a big source of the actual joke here is the formatting, and this thing looks seriously messed up on both my widescreen LCD on a Windows machine, and my normal CRT on a linux machine, and I presume on others. Lots of near-unreadable text, certain toolboxes and things stumbling all over themselves, a few redlinks, and Woody's comment that there's really nothing beyond. Needs some work but certainly could make it. -RAHB 03:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. Very funny and original, although I agree with The Woodburninator that it leaves the reader wanting more (then again, that is what good comedy does; bad comedy does not "know when to stop" and wears a joke out - it can be a fine line as to how much is just enough). I do wish the entries/questions/comments were not so small and were easier to read; I can see how trying to look at the article on a smart phone and appreciate it would be tough. 
