From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Pious Christians Against Shellfish
|
Score: 13 dead in the bombing of a Red Lobster
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 20
|
- Self-Nom & For. I was going to wait for some Pee-related feedback on this, though VFH is slow and Pee Review is even slower (the excellent review I got from PuppyOnTheRadio notwithstanding). Anyway, the main complaint with the prior version of this was that it was too obvious and not subtle enough--a problem (I hope) I have rectified. I suppose I'll find out soon enough. Vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. 196.12.233.30 19:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 Spoiler: This article isn't "good," and can barely be classified as "satire." ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 23:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)- For Staircase CUNt 02:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dame
Sonje Eric 15:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- For That was very enjoyable. ~ Readmesoon 16:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Strong For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:23, Jul 22
- For. I like the concept and I like the humour in it as well. I think the point is primary to the humour, but that doesn't diminish the humour. Pup t 06:23, 23/07/2009
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN23:17, 23 Jul
- For. 67.175.51.106 05:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. InMooseWeTrust 15:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. amazing -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 02:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Didn't realise I hadn't voted ChiefjusticeDS 21:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. It could probably use a little more humor, but the concept and present humor combined are enough to justify featuring it. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 05:46, Jul. 31, 2009
- For. Thought it was too obvious and incendiary at first, but I'm warming to it, yeah it's defintely feature worthy --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Le Cejak • <18:32 Aug 05, 2009>
- For. heh, yeah, pretty good satire. Squeegi 03:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Yeah..why not ...I understand the joke - check Leviticus. --
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- For.
               Sir MacMania GUN—[02:18 13 Aug 2009]
|
Against: 7
|
- Against. It's clever. The problem is, humour seems to be of secondary concern to the point. -- malevolent Ape (write) (Riot Porn) 14:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against Its clever, but it didn't tickle me. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. --Docile hippopotamus 06:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. –Flashfreez 23:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Sorry, I think it's a great idea, kind of referencing the whole "pick and choose" thing, but very little of it actually made me laugh. —AlbinoZombie 05:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Against Per PP. And what I said last time. Orian57 Talk
 10:37 1 August 2009
- Sorry about that wording. I must have copy pasted withought thinking or something. Orian57 Talk 16:06 5 August 2009
- Against Not that great, needs more self referential humor.--Dinosinatra 20:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain.. Am I right in thinking you were doing the whole Christians against gays thing, but replacing it with shellfish? I didn't find it quite funny enough to go "For", but not bad enough to go "Against". Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 19:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)- Abstain. Not gonna create a big stir this time, as some positive effort to improve since the last nomination, but as per what Nameable said. Not quite for, not quite against. Also, watch your step, Liver.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain. It is so damn well written, and i know how hard youve worked on this, It's just... you know? I love seafood! I AM AN ABOMINATION! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 07:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Abs. So close. So very close. I really like it. --THINKER 08:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Spoiler: This article isn't "good," and can barely be classified as "satire." ~~
Abstain.. Am I right in thinking you were doing the whole Christians against gays thing, but replacing it with shellfish? I didn't find it quite funny enough to go "For", but not bad enough to go "Against". 
