From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Literary dedications
|
Score: 15 Literary dedications
|
| Nominated by:
|
Nomination - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Dec 8
|
For: 15
|
- N&4 -- Old QFA from OEJ. I really enjoyed it, and I really don't know why it wasn't featured before. VOTE VOET VOT. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Dec 8
- For I dedicate this vote to <insert name here> EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 00:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- For I remember when this was last nommed. I've always wanted to say that! - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 01:39, Dec 9
- Dig again --THINKER 01:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes Bassguy 06:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fur --THE 14:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- For A-fucking-gain -RAHB 05:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Foragain
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- for. nice.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Under user is greedy (not that there's anything wrong with that). Shorter things have been featured, and that's not counting infamous stubs. By the way, I seem to remember OEJ saying that the opening quote is real, which makes it like twenty times funnier. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- For I dedicate this vote to EugeneKay using the {{Username}} template ~Fag x FS
- Took me a minute to realize you actually dedicated that to me, and you weren't {{username}}'ing me back. I should have known, because one of my magical .js bits disables {{username}}. I dedicate this thanks to fag on behalf of <insert name here> EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 20:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- For--Æ 19:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- For--MNM5150 01:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- For Well I voted for this last time, so I will do the same now. MrN
 23:23, Dec 22
 For. --General Insineratehymn 02:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain. I think I recall voting against last time, on the grounds of wanting more. I still do - it's good, but I wants moar, dammit. But what's there is quality, and maybe I'm just greedy, so here is where I'll sit. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against Just to balance things out because EugeneKay voted twice. --Dallasallad 22:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Dec 8
For. --
