| Article: Letter To The Editor
|
Score: 4 pissed off reader(s)
|
| Nominated by:
|
EMC [TALK] 17:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 8
|
- Absolutely brilliant in a disturbing sort of way. --EMC [TALK] 17:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. The paragraphs get redundant after a while. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 20:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- For, but only on the condition that, if featured, the third pic goes on the front page. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:41, Oct 30
- For Despite there being a tad of in-humor, I think it should fit the front page nicely. -RAHB 00:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Core
 Weasel 3689 
- For. Absolutely disturbing in a brilliant sort of way. Second Led's comment about the image, mind. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --General Insineratehymn 22:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Weak Nay i know im going against the masses, but i honestly dont like lots of in-jokes.
- Against I agree with Finnius.--
 Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 16:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against for the same reason as Groovester's weak for. -- Spillin Dylan 00:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Eh.. Not particularly compelling, unfortunately. --THINKER 21:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Abst too many "UnMemes" to contend with
 <3 .talk.work.?pedia.
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
