Uncyclopedia:VFH/Get Some Mortgage (renom)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Get Some Mortgage (history, logs)

Article: Get Some Mortgage

Score: 14.5 mortgages recollected from the bank

Nominated by: Rougethebat.gifAdmiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate SonicLivesPicture.png 02:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
For: 17.5
  1. Nom and FOR - This little gem was nominated some time ago, but didn't get enough votes. I think it's well written and is overall a nice article, especially during this subprime mortgage crisis thingy. - Rougethebat.gifAdmiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate SonicLivesPicture.png 02:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
  2. Topical! --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 02:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
  3. For. a little gem is a little win KoRoBeNiKI 14:42, 24 September 2008
  4. For Hilarious and well written. Oskrawr 10:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
  5. For. Clever idea, well written. -- Style Oranssiviiva.jpg Guide 05:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  6. For. 89.201.206.127 21:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
  7. For. 98.230.55.117 03:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
  8. For I wasn't going to vote at first. But, then I pressed Special:Random and got sent to Get Some Sick. I take that as a divine sign for me to vote. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 17:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  9. Symbol for vote.svg For.Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  10. For it's good and relevant --Dr. Fenwick 20:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  11. For. Oh, this is up is it? OK then... Good time for it I guess... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:05, Sep 26
  12. For --Zorba 19:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote.svg For. MafiaHatBrown.gif Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Icons-flag-gb.png Talk! 21:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  14. For - UnIdiot | GUN.png | Talk | Contribs - 23:23, Sep 28
  15. Symbol for vote.svg For. 84.194.239.240 23:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  16. For. Sir Severian Severian1.jpg CUN.png (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut.png 12:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  17. for. sure. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  18. Symbol for vote.svg For. I've loved it since December. 72.193.236.89 07:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  19. For. 196.207.32.38 20:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  20. Symbol for vote.svg GET SOME VOTE  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 04:24 Oct 03, 2008
  21. For. Epic Win. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. I'm really not seeing what's so funny about this. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 12:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against - at least I could give this article a few claps if it happened to have a picture of Paris Hilton somewhere. --JoeMonco 15:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. Against Reread. Didn't laugh. Once. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. It's not very long - but am I the only one who thinks humour usually comes better in a tighter package? Style Oranssiviiva.jpg Guide 05:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  1. Abstain Aside from being topical I'll have to agree with So So, the idea is good but there seems to me to be few laughs except for the idea. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 10:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. I though nothing would be more vacuous than Paris when she first got the limelight. Why, even investment bankers play far less safely than this these days. -- JoeMonco 15:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Always check the feature queue first.


Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.