Uncyclopedia:VFH/GLaDOS

Article: GLaDOS	Score: -1 piece(s) of cake
Nominated by:	MacMania 10:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
For: 3	Nomination and For MacMania 10:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC) For I've played the video game myself. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 02:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC) For. --*Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:21, Jun. 12, 2008
Against: 4	Against. Not played the game. Don't really get it - and don't see that it would magically become funny if I had played the game either. Well written and stuff, but honestly, I don't see a feature here. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 10:31, Jun 12 Against. Love the game, but this article was written in conflicting styles and was poorly formatted. I sorta see your joke here, but I think that this is just too in-jokey to be funny to the random reader. sir sysrq @ 17:18 Jun 13 Against. Yea, as the above really. Probably the biggest problem for me is that it really looks messy. I also don't know the game, so maybe missed the funny. Mr N 17:31, Jun 13 Against. Too esoteric for my taste. Sorry. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:01, Jun 13
Comments	Pee Review submitted, done at Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/GLaDOS Abstain for now. Well written, but I have to issues with it: the formatting is a bit problematic, maybe you can find a different format to place the computer's output. Also, I think that only people who played Portal will understand it? ~ 10:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Somewhat fixed output, still working on making it less universe-dependent. MacMania 02:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC) Abs. I'm confused, something about cake, not enough for against. --THINKER 16:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC) strong abstain. no idea what you just said. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Abstain.-Just not my thing, I'm sure that it's very good though--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)