Forum:At least *some* relevancy?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > At least *some* relevancy?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6266 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
I read the "be funny and not just stupid." If something falls under just stupid, should we assume that it's our sworn duty to turn retardedness into awesomeness?
- Yes. Whoever you are. --
05:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC) - Technically, retardedness should be transmogrified into fantasticalness, while awesomeness is a metamorphosed form of inanity (which is not the same as insanity). --
06:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC) - /me immediately checks out IP's contributions, cynically assuming that they'll now go off and blank a bunch of pages, or maybe put "This article is now awes0me lol" on them. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- /me says something wise, like a Feng Shui master passing his mastery of furniture relocation on to his student, who's skills and experience at furniture relocation are less than masterful. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, look I'm giving advice! Also, yes. --The Zombiebaron 15:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- "...should we assume that it's our sworn duty to turn retardedness into awesomeness?" Yeah, sure, except that it's often better just to put it on VFD. Or Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion, your choice. I mean, look: retarded is retarded. You want to try to turn "Charizard IS the Salvashun of Mankine" into awesomeness? You want to spend 48 hours in Rewrite Hell? Do yourself a flavor. Just nominate the bastard for deletion. Then write something else, something awesome. ----OEJ 02:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
