User talk:Hetelllies
Helo
- Hola. Como estas? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- hi how's my first time?
- It's amazing. Actually, that's a question I should be asking you. I do hope you're enjoying the site? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- thanks i am enjoying it!!!!
- Good to know, it's what we strive toward. If you plan to stick around and become an active editor, feel free to click the "midless drivel" link in my signature and leave me a message if you need to ask a question. If you simply want to chat, feel free to keep posting here and I'll see it. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've read it! but it seems like normal chatter. well thanks anyway... I'll be uploading some pics to make the article more interesting.
- Whoops, I forgot that I replied here before the welcoming committee did! One moment...
- Umm Thanks? I think i will try the adopt a noob program
- That welcome isn't as creepy as it seems. It's actually just a template that I have to insert. Also, if you're going to enter Adopt-A-Noob, I recommend that you contact one of the users here on their talk page rather than just putting the adoption template on your userpage. You'll be far more likely to get noticed that way. Just make sure to check that they're still active on the site by looking in the activity column. Good luck! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey I think i have nearly completed it... could you please review it for me? Hetelllies 05:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, an admin appears to have deleted the article as per our Codeine's Mum vanity policy. Because the article wasn't about somebody that any substantial number of people would have heard of, it was classified as vanity and deleted. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh what a waste! Thanks for telling me about it by the way, helps me feel less gutted. How substantial a number must there be for an article to be accepted?
- By the way, What must one do to get the article back? I think I would like to have that intro part back. Not neccesarily post another one.But if could I wouldn't mine trying. --Hetelllies 00:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Drive by comment: Probably the easiest thing to do would be to find an admin and ask them to restore it in your userspace. It won't get deleted there and you can work on it till you feel it's ready for mainspace; though if it's vanity it'll get deleted again in mainspace. Have fun and feel free to hit up my talk page if you have any questions. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:20, 1 May
- Also, in response to your first question, the person would have to be pretty well known. I think a good general point of reference would be if a publication, like a news agency or tabloid, has ever run a story about the person or substantially mentioned the person as someone of interest. If it's just "Mr. Jones's garage was burned down once again by his wife's oxygen tank exploding", it would probably still qualify as vanity, but if it's "Mr. Jones, eccentric host of thatoneshowthateverybodywatches, has been charged for attempted murder after blowing up his wife's oxygen tank for the second time in a week", it probably wouldn't get deleted. It all gets rather iffy if the person isn't some sort of public celebrity. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think Mririan is pretty well known enough but the problem is was that they were the mostly Japanese. For example, http://www.gyao.jp/news/magibon/ other sources include Playboy Japan , some other Japanese newspaper. You could see the proof on youtube or the link. But I must admit... Her story is a little too 'vanityish'. Read the article on Encylopedia Dramatica and uncyclopedia. Well, it seems to me uncyclopedia doesn't support the idea of a flame war. Anyways, strangely enough Encyclopedia Dramatica dosen't seem to have an article in wikipedia. Uncyclopedia does however. BTW Thanks for ye reply Hetelllies 01:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, multiple Encyclopedia Dramatica articles have been created on Wikipedia, but all of them have been deleted because Wikipeda doesn't find ED to be notable. Also, it wouldn't be very wise to mention Encyclopedia Dramatica very often here, because Uncyclopedia and ED users generally hate each others guts. A large portion of our vandals also travel here from ED. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ok got your point. Anyway I have got back the article And I think I will ship it to ED. That being thought of, do you have any recommendations as to where would be a good start as to learning the ropes of uncyclopedia.Hetelllies 02:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- The best things for all new users to read are How to Be Funny and Not Just Stupid and the Beginner's Guide. Read them, know them, memorize them. There's a test on them Friday, and it's worth 60% of your semester grade. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ok got your point. Anyway I have got back the article And I think I will ship it to ED. That being thought of, do you have any recommendations as to where would be a good start as to learning the ropes of uncyclopedia.Hetelllies 02:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, multiple Encyclopedia Dramatica articles have been created on Wikipedia, but all of them have been deleted because Wikipeda doesn't find ED to be notable. Also, it wouldn't be very wise to mention Encyclopedia Dramatica very often here, because Uncyclopedia and ED users generally hate each others guts. A large portion of our vandals also travel here from ED. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think Mririan is pretty well known enough but the problem is was that they were the mostly Japanese. For example, http://www.gyao.jp/news/magibon/ other sources include Playboy Japan , some other Japanese newspaper. You could see the proof on youtube or the link. But I must admit... Her story is a little too 'vanityish'. Read the article on Encylopedia Dramatica and uncyclopedia. Well, it seems to me uncyclopedia doesn't support the idea of a flame war. Anyways, strangely enough Encyclopedia Dramatica dosen't seem to have an article in wikipedia. Uncyclopedia does however. BTW Thanks for ye reply Hetelllies 01:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, an admin appears to have deleted the article as per our Codeine's Mum vanity policy. Because the article wasn't about somebody that any substantial number of people would have heard of, it was classified as vanity and deleted. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey I think i have nearly completed it... could you please review it for me? Hetelllies 05:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- That welcome isn't as creepy as it seems. It's actually just a template that I have to insert. Also, if you're going to enter Adopt-A-Noob, I recommend that you contact one of the users here on their talk page rather than just putting the adoption template on your userpage. You'll be far more likely to get noticed that way. Just make sure to check that they're still active on the site by looking in the activity column. Good luck! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Umm Thanks? I think i will try the adopt a noob program
- Whoops, I forgot that I replied here before the welcoming committee did! One moment...
- I've read it! but it seems like normal chatter. well thanks anyway... I'll be uploading some pics to make the article more interesting.
- Good to know, it's what we strive toward. If you plan to stick around and become an active editor, feel free to click the "midless drivel" link in my signature and leave me a message if you need to ask a question. If you simply want to chat, feel free to keep posting here and I'll see it. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- thanks i am enjoying it!!!!
- It's amazing. Actually, that's a question I should be asking you. I do hope you're enjoying the site? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Welcome![edit source]
Hello, Hetelllies, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:
- Beginner's Guide
- Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
- How to be funny and not just stupid
If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Hetelllies/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Again, welcome! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
This thing[edit source]
A girl by the name of Arguecat came in our channel and pointed out to us that some guy here was trolling and vandalizing. He was also apparently impersonating you. So that guy's been banned and stuff, but we noticed that the article that this shit apparently started over was about some youtube personality. Now, generally Uncyclopedia does not have articles about that kind of stuff. ED does. Maybe you'd like to write for them. But we usually prohibit it. However, as Arguecat expressed some concern as to the work you put into the article, I've saved it from deletion, and moved it to your userspace, at User:Hetelllies/Mririan. Do with it what you choose, but chances are we won't allow it, being that it's about such an obscure youtube personality from Japan. Perhaps you could get a translator and put it on the Japanese Uncyclopedia? -RAHB 01:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- You also left the VFD template on it. Don't worry, I removed it. Just a note for the future. ☭ 01:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well aren't you ever so helpful DJ? -RAHB 01:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks but I'm not really interested in having that article. I'd rather edit the one at wikipedia. You may flush it as you please. (that includes the one you moved to my userspace). It seem to have attracted a lot of strange attractions. As for what I'll be doing here. I think I will write an article on the enjo kosai phenomenon. And that bugger hetelllies on wikipedia is not me.Hetelllies 02:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- If the hetelllies at wikipedia is not you, who is it? And I thought you just said you would rather edit the one at wikipedia? If he is not you, then who are you on wikipedia?Arguecat3 02:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really exist at wikipedia. Not yet. But soon I would. As the saying goes, I'm going to be a wikipedian. That hetelllies on wikipedia could be someone impersonating as me, and I assure you, it's not difficult to impersonate another. Or may be it was all a naming coincidence. Nasty but sweet. Anyways this means, I'll be doing better things. Wiki P here I come.Hetelllies 02:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm, so as I understand it, you don't want/need that article around? -RAHB 04:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I don't need it. Thanks for flushing it... Hetelllies 11:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, as there is a corresponding link over at Wikipedia it wouldn't be against our site policies. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Yeah, but the Wikipedia page is a pathetic stub, though it does mention her being at the top of Japanese youtube views or something. I suppose that's notable. However, it was voted for deletion, so I moved it back to this guy's space. But seeing as he doesn't want it around... -RAHB 09:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, as there is a corresponding link over at Wikipedia it wouldn't be against our site policies. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- I don't need it. Thanks for flushing it... Hetelllies 11:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm, so as I understand it, you don't want/need that article around? -RAHB 04:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really exist at wikipedia. Not yet. But soon I would. As the saying goes, I'm going to be a wikipedian. That hetelllies on wikipedia could be someone impersonating as me, and I assure you, it's not difficult to impersonate another. Or may be it was all a naming coincidence. Nasty but sweet. Anyways this means, I'll be doing better things. Wiki P here I come.Hetelllies 02:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- If the hetelllies at wikipedia is not you, who is it? And I thought you just said you would rather edit the one at wikipedia? If he is not you, then who are you on wikipedia?Arguecat3 02:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks but I'm not really interested in having that article. I'd rather edit the one at wikipedia. You may flush it as you please. (that includes the one you moved to my userspace). It seem to have attracted a lot of strange attractions. As for what I'll be doing here. I think I will write an article on the enjo kosai phenomenon. And that bugger hetelllies on wikipedia is not me.Hetelllies 02:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well aren't you ever so helpful DJ? -RAHB 01:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)