Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/Jerry Falwell

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • I'm nominating this in the hope that, should it pass VFH, it appear on the mainpage on May 15 (the anniversary of his death). It will piss off Conservapedia, in the very least. But I digress. Lastly, Pee review. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Well...it would appear that I'm a prophet of some kind. I was hoping to be a false one. They get all the ladies. Apparently, I'm anti-conservative, too. True story. I always thought that I was anti-dipwad. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, as I stated in what was at that time my last profile on Conservapedia (this is newer) before it was deleted I am a registered Republican who usually votes Libertarian in the general election, I am a strong supporter of the U.S. Constitution, including gun rights, but I am also "anti-conservative" because I happen to disagree with the Great (Big Douchebag)Andrew Schlafly!--Naughtius Maximus Leaf.jpg F@H Woof!Za slice.jpg MeowMUN 05:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
To be fair, though, if we use the Conservapedia definition of "conservative" (the only one that counts on Conservapedia) "anti-conservative" and "anti-dipwad" are one in the same.--Naughtius Maximus Leaf.jpg F@H Woof!Za slice.jpg MeowMUN 14:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
For any Conservapedians that may be reading this: remember that Jesus Christ stood for the weak, the disenfranchised, and for the spirit of the Law. Jerry Falwell stood for the strong, the powerful, and the letter of the Law...but mostly, Jerry Falwell stood for Jerry Falwell. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Modusoperandi, you and I and many people here may believe what you said about what Jesus stood for, but most Conservapedians believe he stood for hating everyone different than you and anyone who even slightly disagrees with you.[1] I think we all know that what the maker of that template meant by "compromising the truth" is acknowleging the possibility that Schlafly & Co. could be wrong about something. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf.jpg F@H Woof!Za slice.jpg MeowMUN 21:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Uh, guys? Don't you think you should take this discussion to the forums? --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
And give up these sweet seats? No way! Woo! Go Rush! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

If it gets 12 votes today, could we STILL feature it may 15th? Like, place a bookmark on it?   Le Cejak <Apr 25, 2008 [20:49]>

I second that idea. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf.jpg F@H Woof!Za slice.jpg MeowMUN 22:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)