Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Get Out Of A Relationshit (second Opinion)
HowTo:Get Out Of A Relationshit [edit source]
Reserved for Orian57
- 07:01, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
I'll try not to get out of this within 24 hours. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:18, October 26, 2009 (UTC)--Sorry; saw your note. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:02, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
I'll give this to Why do I--- 21:56, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
Oh and I dont have any pics at the moment so spare me the "doesnt have pics" part--- 21:59, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
- I just saw your note. I can do this, but can't guarantee 24 hours--48, yes. And sorry, but you will get a note about there not being any pics--it's a basic part of the Pee Review process and even the template--I can't even do it if I leave out that part. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 03:51, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
Humour: | 3 | Building a relationshit with your reviewer I have a habit of telling the reviewee about myself so you know how unqualified I am. I was NotM for Sept. 2009, and just got nommed for RotM for the second time, so some people think I don't totally suck. As to your topic, I've been both the dumper and dumpee in relationshits, and have helped heal some.
I put Prose and Formatting comments in with Humour for the most part so I don't repeat myself unnecessarily. Also I get nitpicky, but I've found reviewees often like that as it helps them fix grammar that ain't no good, speeling errers, etc. In this article, I'm just going to point out a few. I think this article has potential, but can use some improvement. Hopefully, my review will help make that easier. Your introduction
Relationshit at School
Relationshit with Parents
Relationshit with Girls
Actually, this article could use more humour throughout. I'm pointing out the parts I found humorous; you can assume I think the rest could use some more. Relationshit with boys
Relationshit with Authority
I think your article could use some kind of conclusion, even if it's only a sentence or two. |
Concept: | 7 | I think getting out of a bad relationship (relationshit) works as a concept, but can use more development as described above. I almost gave a lower score because I'm still not sure the concept's clear. Your introduction includes "hate each other" and, with other parts, seems to imply a relationshit isn't something you want to repair, but is something want to get out of. But your article talks about improving relationships, or changing a relationshit into a good relationship. I'd recommend working on your intro so it fits the article better, or working on the article to better fit your intro. |
Prose and formatting: | 5 | Some of your prose I liked, but there a great deal of spelling and grammatical errors that got in the way. I think your formatting is fine. I'd like to see you flesh this out a little more, adding another sentence or two to each part. Also I think you might want to give a reminder once or twice that this is a relastionshit you're talking about and not a relationship. Yes, I know you use the word "relationshit" several times, but many readers (me) can get to where they start reading that as an alternate spelling of "relationship." Readers tend to be lazy, so sometimes (always) writers have to help them along a little. |
Images: | 0 | I know you didn't want a comment about there being no images, but that's a basic part of the Pee Review and also of this template. The template won't work at all if I don't give you a score, and the automatic score for no images is zero. I think a combination of images of a "mad couple" "happy couple" "loving couple" "one person in the couple kicking the other one's ass/hitting them/shooting them/something like that" would work. |
Miscellaneous: | 5 | Average of above, not counting Image score. |
Final Score: | 20 | I think this is a workable concept, but needs more humour and more development. I hope this helps, and good luck with this and future articles! |
Reviewer: | King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 02:40, November 3, 2009 (UTC) |