Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gerard Way (Review it or else)

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Gerard Way

  ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 15:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Seeing as you begged me to... :P -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Humour:	8	I did get a fair few chuckles throughout this article, mostly around the portions of the article that were centered solely on music and I did get a good chuckle from the Powerpuff Girls reference. I do think that the subject regarding his writing could have been built on a bit more - what you have already is pretty good but I think you could squeeze more potential out of it to make it even better. All-in-all an overall nice attempt that could just do with another little push for an improvement.
Concept:	8	The concept of the article more or less stays true to reality with the obvious humourous additions and the article doesn't try to convey a different meaning or scenario, so there's next to nothing to complain about here. It may be worth adding a tiny bit more to relate Gerard Way and My Chemical Romance a bit better but what you've got already is sufficient enough, so I wouldn't worry too much about that.
Prose and formatting:	10	Absolutely no issues here. The article obviously takes the encyclopedic approach in terms of presentation, as a lot of it is based on the Wikipedia article of the same name, and it does its purpose pretty well. Formatting is pretty good too, everything is neat and easy to read so I can't really moan about anything.
Images:	6.5	Unfortunately I'd say this is the weakest part of the article. While the images do stay true to the article source, there's nothing too special on a humourous scale, although I did feel that the album art was linked well with the article and the bulletproof vest image did work for that one reference, however the image highlighting his groovy fashion did seem a little bit too generic. I'm not sure how easy it would be to try and make something funny out of that but it would be great if it didn't look as much like it was just taken from Google. The best way to convey humour from the images probably would involve some playing around with an external editor (like Photoshop or GIMP) to see what you can get out of it. Otherwise a fair effort on the image side of things that stays relevant to the article.
Miscellaneous:	8.1	Average score calculation.
Final Score:	40.6	To sum things up a pretty good effort that just needs building on a little bit in order to get it to its full potential. What you've got on the whole is pretty good as it is with some laughable moments that can stand strong as it is but could be pushed a little bit further mostly through expansions. Hope this review helps and feel free to message me...or prod me in IRC while I'm sleeping if you have any questions. :)
Reviewer:	-- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)