Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Battleship Potemkin second review
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Battleship Potemkin[edit source]
It had a superb first review- which I have worked on. Zombiebaron made a great image and I'm thinking there could be feature here despite the very dense content. I'm looking for a way to raise the standard of this one and hopefully be step closer to the hall of shame. Thanks for your time:)--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Battleship Potemkin is being reviewed by Your Source for Fine Scented Pee And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him |
Humour: | 6 | avg of each seckshun
|
Concept: | 7 | I'm surprised that we didn't have this article, already! However, the point of the article itself is lost to me. Is it a movie? Is it a real boat? Now I'm so confused that I can't even remember what the actual history is... |
Prose and formatting: | 6 | You need to go over the article itself. Something's not quite right with the grammar, I think. It makes the article, in my eyes at least, kinda confusing. |
Images: | 7 | I like the pictures, but the captions were nothing special. Captions are what matters, really, not the pictures. The pictures could be utter crap, but if the captions are good people won't care. |
Miscellaneous: | 6.5 | {{Pee|6|7|6|7}}
|
Final Score: | 32.5 | I'm sorry it took so long, Sycamore! I just had finals, so... But anyways, get working on the article! Maybe you improved it since I started this review, but I didn't check. Anyway, this is my honest opinion, and although the article needs some work, I'm sure that it can be improved. |
Reviewer: | • <May 14, 2008 [0:23]> |