UnNews talk:Boy subjected to harsh criticism, cries like little girl

I wrote this article. It was me. Blame me. -- 21:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Also, Squiggle helped. He fixed the grammar and stuffs.

Hah. That's horrible. Nice article. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 21:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Hilarious article. --General Insineratehymn 22:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Gustavo and Insineratehymn. Much appreciated. -- 22:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

LOL

This article was hilarious, someone should record it - Uncle J

I'll record it. I need to get a good one to get me nominated for an Emmanuel Goldstein again anyways. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 20:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I feel all warm & furrzy inside now

check the headline. oh shit, i just realized my ip was recorded.

fuck

Oh wow

This article is hilarious. I think the main problem it has is the "nutshell" section at the beginning, which implies the article is all about one joke and not worth reading. I felt sorry that I hadn't read it before removing it from VFH during my rounds, because I laughed hard when I actually read it while putting the tag on it.--<<>> 23:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

You should have voted for it man, keep it alive, this is one of the best articles i've ever read, It's better than most of my stuff anyways lol and i think my stuff is pretty good, I'm going to try to get it featured again in a few weeks, shame it got taken off - Uncle J

Damnmit! The irony is that I never put that nutshell thing on, but there were other good contribs made. The elaboration of the anonymous joke was added, and then "vile and vulgar" was replaced by "a fucking disgrace". Some IP also added a paragraph which makes no sence at all, which I later reverted. Oh well. I'll get to writing a new, hopefully beter one. -- 09:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I hate haet hat IPs. They ruin UnNews articles with their suckitude. --love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 14:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Pretty fast re-nom there

Oh well. The only sad thing is most people vote "Against" before reading it again, thinking it's precisely the same. -- 19:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that kinda pisses me off, actually...--<<>> 22:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)