From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review AFTER the rewrite[edit]

Humour: 8.5 a solidly humorous article that provided a more than adequate amount of chuckles.
Concept: 9.5 great concept, despite similar articles (see mousetrap).
Prose and formatting: 7.5 no big problems, just a few redlinks. looks a little squished in the middle, maybe the template on the right could be trimmed & un-wide-ed.
Images: 10 a proper amount of images that are well executed.
Miscellaneous: 8 excellent mix of encyclopedic tone with absurd facts.
Final Score: 43.5 a very nicely done rewrite. if you're merely looking for it to be a solid article, your work is done. if you're going to go the extra mile or you're looking for a VFH, a little length couldn't hurt. maybe a section on a famous mass-escape from a zoo, or fossil evidence of gigantic flying radioactive toasters, or something.
Reviewer: --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 8 Pretty damn good, I chuckled, and even laughed in places.
Concept: 9 Like the concept, and well followed through.
Prose and formatting: 9 Well written, easy to follow, formatting is good.
Images: 10 Really good images, well used. I like.
Miscellaneous: 9 A really good re-write.
Final Score: 45 As a re-write, superb. As an article, very good, if you ask me. I'm not always a great judge of what plays well on VFH, but it would get my vote.
Reviewer: --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Redirecting Aluminata to Illuminati[edit]

Sorry, just thought that would be a funny pun. Jetpakturtle (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)