Talk:Toaster
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review AFTER the rewrite[edit source]
| Humour: | 8.5 | a solidly humorous article that provided a more than adequate amount of chuckles. |
| Concept: | 9.5 | great concept, despite similar articles (see mousetrap). |
| Prose and formatting: | 7.5 | no big problems, just a few redlinks. looks a little squished in the middle, maybe the template on the right could be trimmed & un-wide-ed. |
| Images: | 10 | a proper amount of images that are well executed. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | excellent mix of encyclopedic tone with absurd facts. |
| Final Score: | 43.5 | a very nicely done rewrite. if you're merely looking for it to be a solid article, your work is done. if you're going to go the extra mile or you're looking for a VFH, a little length couldn't hurt. maybe a section on a famous mass-escape from a zoo, or fossil evidence of gigantic flying radioactive toasters, or something. |
| Reviewer: | -- 23:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |
| Humour: | 8 | Pretty damn good, I chuckled, and even laughed in places. |
| Concept: | 9 | Like the concept, and well followed through. |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | Well written, easy to follow, formatting is good. |
| Images: | 10 | Really good images, well used. I like. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | A really good re-write. |
| Final Score: | 45 | As a re-write, superb. As an article, very good, if you ask me. I'm not always a great judge of what plays well on VFH, but it would get my vote. |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |
Redirecting Aluminata to Illuminati[edit source]
Sorry, just thought that would be a funny pun. Jetpakturtle (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)