Talk:Subliminal Messages
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Subliminal Messages.
This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about Subliminal Messages. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
|
 | The contents of Subliminal message were merged into Subliminal Messages and they now redirect here. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
From Pee Review[edit source]
I wrote the page...picture by someone else. Let me know what you think.
| Humour: | 8 | I was amused. Good job. |
| Concept: | 10 | Great topic for mockage, and pulled off well. |
| Prose and formatting: | 5 | This is a weak point. It needs some links, definitely, and you need to think of ways to make some of the sentences make sense as written. I also recommend using the <small> wiki formatting for the subliminal messages, as they're a little too easy to see at the moment. They're like... superliminal right now... |
| Images: | 7 | Effective use of the joke. Could use more images to drive the point home. If necessary, utilize Image Request. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | It made me laugh, and that always gets you a good review. |
| Final Score: | 38 | I liked this article. I think just a little cleanup, and you're ready for VFH. |
| Reviewer: | --<< >> 02:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
| |
I've made some of the messages more subliminal, but I bet someone can do an even better job. -- 04:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 6 | Not quite LOL, but amusing. |
| Concept: | 9 | Good topic. |
| Prose and formatting: | 6 | Too hard to read at the moment - not sure what to do about this. Good getting the variation per section. |
| Images: | 7 | Nice, could do with one or two more good ones. |
| Miscellaneous: | 7 | |
| Final Score: | 35 | Good idea, needs another concept or two and up to twice the length. |
| Reviewer: | David Gerard 11:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |