Talk:Naruto/Archive 1

Screw all of you

Alright look, yes I am responsible for the reamke of this article but you know what? I'm keeping it. Look this article is poorly formatted, massive spam fest, it's sure as hell isn't funny. Also it was the reason Naruto was CPV'ed now my article may not be the best but it has decent quality pictures, nice formatting, and was actually APPROVED BY AN ADMIN. So there. -- CartoonDiablo

Can you please tell us who this admin is? Your remake is definately formatted well enough and isn't a cluttered mess like the original. That's all the positive feedback I can give however. Is it because of those reasons that the admin approved it, possibly expecting you to make it better? Roman Dog Bird 17:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I reiterate my previous proposal (see DELETE THIS SHIT section). Also, I apologise to CartoonDiablo for being sort of a jerk. To your credit, you actually went and did something about the disturbing lack of Naruto on Uncyclopedia. And yes, the formatting and pictures are an improvement; I was hoping there might be some way to retain those, yet at the same time not simply dismiss the other article entirely. So does anyone have any ideas for compromise? Once again, the great breadth of the Naruto world with humour potential implies to me that perhaps a split would be appropriate... 206.248.152.26 18:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought gay jokes are lame....? Instead of arguing which one is the best and which one is approved by admin, why not combine both ideas? And how can you claim that NarutoTitle.jpg and GayNaruto.png are "decent quality" pictures like you said? It's not even an appropriate picture for uncyclopedia standards... Reinn 03:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

COMBINE?! Are you insane? Roman Dog Bird 17:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought all that we posted in here is for the good future of Uncyclopedia, not some sort of edit war and such? We can keep the funny parts from the new article and mixed it with the original ones, can't we? Or another option, let's put Naruto to VFD once again? Reinn 02:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Change it back

http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Feebas_factor/Naruto_Original --203.214.96.203 12:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!! I've been looking for the saved page! Agreed, this is the best naruto article ever. Reinn 02:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

WTF, This page sucks, The original was really, good, I thought it had hilarious jokes, dispite being a cluttered mess, I actually watch the show, and I actually get the jokes, eg: Akamaru: means "red dog", the guy changed his name to Bakamaru, lol I was laughing so hard, and that they made Sasuke Sausage, and his Sharigan Shenanigan, You should organize that page like crazy --221.4.210.128 13:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Some random user, not singed in

Wow, this is, um...

...shit? Honestly, what the hell is this mess? Horribly edited pictures, disturbingly crude "gay" and "emo" humour, and a long rant about why Naruto "is sooo bad". Oh wait, that's probably why the Naruphobes on Uncyclopedia allowed it. 206.248.158.217 19:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

You talk as if you can do any better... Reinn 08:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah - I would've kept the original. Maybe it's not top-notch writing, but at least it's not like.. this. I dunno. Maybe (hopefully) this article will see plenty of contributors, undergo some intense construction work and improve drastically within the same vein of humour. And if it doesn't work out, I've also got the original page saved if anyone wants it back. Meh... 206.248.158.217 19:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Hell, I'd rather have the original page back than this disaster. And I even voted a couple of times to have that one deleted, since I hate Naruto so much. Seriously, why would anybody make such a horrifying page, and why was it allowed? This isn't an improvement at all. Frankie! 20:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The original kicked ass, I don't know why everyone hated it. It was the best damn article on Uncyclopedia. This piece of shit is nothing close to it... O LOL NARUTO AND SASUKE R GHEY. Please, bring the old article back... Surely someone preserved it? It was genious. --203.214.96.203 04:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

WTF. We can't edit this back?--203.214.96.203 12:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This new article isn't very good. Even though the original was WAY too long, there were a lot of funny things in it that somebody should use to make the new article. Glad you have the old one saved.

DELETE THIS SHIT

BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU.

Sorry, Roman Dog Bird 19:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I created a link to Naruto from battle Royale, which I was writing, only to discover that the once amusing Naruto page was now a bleak cascade of poor writing. That was pretty good writing, just there, "A bleak cascade"...vivid. But Yeah, this is shite.

SIGH. Funny thing is, alot of people said the exact same thing about the other page, too. I don't suppose there's any potential for compromise...? 206.248.152.26 20:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I wonder... how deluded would I have to be to propose some sort of split for the article? Seeing as half the article just deals with characters, it might seem appropriate to do so there. Then some of the... more clever writing from the other version could be incorporated as well. Please express your answer in DPP (delusion percentage points). Thank you. 206.248.152.26 20:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Rocks

Yeah, I really love this show, and the only one that can be gay is Orochiooru and posibally Kabuto. Honstly, I don't see why people hate this show so much. It has a hell of alot of violence and a sophisticated array of charcters. That bull shit Robot Chicken only talks about rape, shooting animals, some celebs and emitting wind from the anus. Freakin Poke'mon beats Robot Chicken, and I hate Poke'mon so badly that I got some weird ass voodoo kid to burn those bastards names. I would do somthin that lame, but yeah, Robot chicken sucks more thatn a gay vampire. And Naruto knocks all the other shows dead with "1000 years of deATH!!!" Okay lemme end this bull before it become total brain kill. 209.247.22.8 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Arknoruto

What is there to hate about the show? Well:

• Sasuke. From the little that I've skimmed of the series, he seems to be the focus. Um, but isn't the series called "Naruto"? Kishimoto basically listens to what the fans want, and gives the spotlight over to Sasuke, since, I believe, he is the most popular chracter. That is not how you right a good story. He is catering to his audience. Many other chracters with potential to do something are forgotten about while the attention shifts to some other dork instead. Plus, Sasuke is such a terrible character.

• Who gives a shit if "Orochiooru" (lol) is "gay"?

• Speaking of Ororchimaru, he's still the main villian, isn't he? What is that shit? What a fucking bore.

• "It has a hell of alot of violence"

So? Since when does this necessarily make something good?

• "and a sophisticated array of charcters."

Many of which aren't used that much, like I stated above.

Please note, this is coming from a guy who stopped reading Naruto around chapter 70 something. I realized I was wasting my time reading shit. So of course, I've definately made some mistakes in my points. But I don't care.

P.S: I do agree that Robot Chicken is shit. It's pretty much Family Guy TIMES 100.

Roman Dog Bird 02:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Naruto chapter <100's suck. Try about 250 or above, when they had "shippuuden" with Akatsuki introduction. But of course you actually wouldnt do that, would ya? Reinn 02:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Nope! Roman Dog Bird 02:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Figured, lol. You remind me of my forum friend whom a flame warrior. Reinn 03:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Yet Another "Narutard"

Who ever wrote this article is gay. Tell me you basterds, what is so gay about anime? Okay, a bunch of people seem to like Familly Guy. Mr.Heburt, GAY< trys to GET Chris. Peter, Gay< Slept with that guy after Lous slept with him (i think a president?) Chris, GAY< cant seem to graps the concept of girls, in one episode, he talks about how he touches himself Stewie, ALMOST GAY, < one episode asks barin "why cant we all just live with other guys? Barin "yeah its called being gay" Stewie "yeah i think im going to do that" numerous gay appereces. Greased up deaf guy FUNNY BUT GAY <a little piece of green stuff cover is prives. I HAVE NOTHING AGAINTS GAY PEOPLE! But calling anime gay is just immature and stupid.--209.247.22.8 02:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)DoomsdayHellfire--209.247.22.8 02:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

WARNING! This page contains profuse whining. Proceed with caution.

You're also incredibly incoherent. I personally don't have anything against anime, but I do hate Naruto.

Roman Dog Bird 02:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, alot of other Naruto Fans are here...

Naruto kicks ass! screw ALL HATERS! Wooot! woot! USA! JAPAN! and those guys and girls who make Twinkies!

--209.247.22.8 02:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Ms.BeatnKill

Roman Dog Bird 02:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Fan # 102123238-272352

Like guys think anime girls are cute girls think anime guys are cute. Yeah, all u pervs who like Hikira/Dawn. Yeah, in yer fuckin face crash n' burn !

Roman Dog Bird 02:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

CVP (again)

Some genius decided to revert it back to the old page again, which is only marginally better than the other one. It seems that nobody can write a good parody of this awful series. Roman Dog Bird 20:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I am! Behold! User:Jedravent/Naruto --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete it!

This article must be deleted. It's no funny (at all) & there's lack of sense of humor, it's more a parody than a humorization.

Uncyc is a Parody of wikipedia... -- (Bonner) (Talk) 20:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The New Version

So, I have a new version of the page at User:Jedravent/Naruto. I'm sure that many people are relieved that a good article for the subject has finally been made. Please review it at Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Jedravent/Naruto. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)