Talk:Is a 1982 Mitsubishi Colt better than a Bugatti Veyron?

Ha! I like this. You should put it in Pee Review - I think with some work it could be featured. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Good idea. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Hm; this article is now thw #1 search result for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.--The Jeff Killer 06:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

I just received some positive feedback about this from a WotM winner, so I was just wondering how good people think this article is, and if anyone can think of any worthwile contributions to make to it. Thanks. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

I guess I'll chime in. Maybe it should be like a complete scientific experiment, with a hypothesis and everything. Also, needs more blue links. I hope more advice follows. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

That does sound like a good format for it. The lack of links is partly that I couldn't find many places to make links, and partly because I'm lazy. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Since I used the Pee Review Table for mu judging for PLS, where someone had a go at rewriting this, I thought I'd let you know what I thought of your article.

Humour:	10	I laughed. A lot. I only laughed at one article more during my entire judging period, and it won second place.
Concept:	10	This article had no business being as funny as it was. I thought, "Oh great, a car article. Yawn." Boy, was I surprised when it was actually really, really good. A one-sided battle where the side that should lose wins is always amusing.
Prose and formatting:	5	Formatting could be cleaned up. A couple of sections "feel" listy.
Images:	6	Great work in turning sub-par images into winners through great caption work.
Miscellaneous:	9	This article beat 8 articles that were competing from the PLS prize. Meaning, if those articles had all been placed in a straight up contest with yours, I'd have given you fifth place. Considering the quality of articles in this year's PLS, that really freaking impressive.
Final Score:	40	Excellent work. Great read. I enjoyed this article a lot.
Reviewer:	--<<>> 03:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

HAHAHA, the last two ranks are 69 Hilarious!