Talk:Donald Trump's Report Card
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This article is not funny and has ZERO reason to be featured[edit source]
I’m not even a trump supporter, but tbh, an entire article of “haha orange man bad amirite?” does not deserve to be on the fucking front page. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, humor is subjective. What you can find not funny yourself, others can. And many people found this article funny, so it was featured; that's how democracy works. And I mean, considering the shit Trump has done, he totally deserves the "orange man bad" criticism. DaniPine3 (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- ok I get your point, but this isn’t “criticism”, this is braindead Reddit-tier attempts at humor Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- well, as I've said before, humor is subjective. other people liked it, and there were enough votes to feature it. the good thing I find in Uncyclopedia is that most articles have different kinds of humor, so if one isn't your cup of tea, there is probably another one that will be. DaniPine3 (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- The main problem is that, like I have said before, some of these painfully bad articles become kind of unavoidable due to being featured boldly on the front page. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- well, I think the best choice here is ignoring them. the good thing is that they will go out eventually and be replaced by others. and maybe the next one that appears on front page is one you'll like more. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you Opossum! It's stupid. And yeah what Trump has done! Beating Hillary Queen of the Universe Hag Bitch, that was just so anti-matrix. JFC. What Hillary and her ilk have done - I could write a book the size of War & Peace, but it would be shocking and depressing because it would be real. Nacky (talk) 01:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- well, I think the best choice here is ignoring them. the good thing is that they will go out eventually and be replaced by others. and maybe the next one that appears on front page is one you'll like more. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- The main problem is that, like I have said before, some of these painfully bad articles become kind of unavoidable due to being featured boldly on the front page. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- well, as I've said before, humor is subjective. other people liked it, and there were enough votes to feature it. the good thing I find in Uncyclopedia is that most articles have different kinds of humor, so if one isn't your cup of tea, there is probably another one that will be. DaniPine3 (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- ok I get your point, but this isn’t “criticism”, this is braindead Reddit-tier attempts at humor Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)