Talk:Afairyism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Afairyism. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

From Pee Review

I’ve just started this but can’t think of much to put in it. The idea of the article is take all ad hominem attacks thrown at Atheists and redirect them at Afairyists in an attempt to have a good laugh at the absurdity of these arguments. Weri long wang 11:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	8	Funny, not so much that it builds up, but that the whole concept is inane and just funny to start with despite the deeper message.
Concept:	7	Some pretty solid content, but could use some expanding in some sections. Maybe a more in-depth explanation of the causes and history of Afairyism, as it appears to be some sort of religion, would be good. Try to make the article seem more encyclopedia-like somehow (ideas and suggestions coming soon to a theatre near you!).
Prose and formatting:	10	Could use some more links.
Images:	0	No pictures? Not even a picture of a fairy?! A good idea would be to use Image:Nihilism.png with a caption reading "A fairy, according to an individual who believes in Afairyism" or something of that nature. There is a picture now. I made it myself. Ignore this score of 0! Weri long wang 18:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Miscellaneous:	10	Categorized, little or no spelling and grammar errors, and overall, a good execution.
Final Score:	35	Not bad.
Reviewer:	--EMC [TALK] 02:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

I got some positive feedback when starting this article and dedcided to put some effort into it. I think it's approaching completion now. Can I have some advice on the finishing touches and parts that should be added or taken from the article.

Add some more links, yo! --EMC ^[TALK] 16:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	8	Very funny. Would be a 9, maybe even a 10 if it wasn't for the very last line.
Concept:	7	Pretty good concept, a good new twist on Atheism.
Prose and formatting:	9	Excellent prose. Gets a bit listy though.
Images:	8	A couple of good ones, but the WTC one has to go. A very weird, and not humourous take on it that appears to clutch at straws.
Miscellaneous:	9	That last sentence is annoying.
Final Score:	41	Pretty much VFH material. Just needs a little tidying here and there.
Reviewer:	–—Hv (talk) 12/05 19:49