Forum talk:Should Template:BUTT POOP!!!! be restored to full health?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BUTT
POOP!!!!
Should this forum be protected?[edit source]
I see no reason why it should be.
17:06, 2 September 2011- No, it shouldn't be protected. There's no reason for it to be. -- 17:21, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
- "protected" lol!. Protected from drama? Hey, you saw the note TKF left. Daddy said you can't have your BUTT POOP!!!! ice cream and banning discussion about said issue is also tantamount to ice cream - definitely not censorship lol!--
- Apparently, TKF has decided to take pre-emptive action and close off this debate once and for all. Frankly, I wasn't seeing this forum go anywhere in an explosive direction so this move strikes me as highly autocratic and authoritarian. TKF's attacks on Socky's performance as an admin (yeah, I saw his talk-page) and his threatening manner in my opinion, is disgusting. If you use an iron fist, it will damn well piss people off and the fact that he's bashing and threatening a fellow admin to defend himself only makes me more angry with him. If this is the way bureaucrats behave with even admins, I think we made a mistake in 'cratting TKF. --Scofield & Dudes 17:48, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
- The "BUTT POOP!!!! can stay in mainspace but is satellite articles can't" was the compromise position between when Spang gave up on the BUTT POOP!!!! VFD deletion. Since the BUTT POOP!!!! deletion was rigged, and we now have a pro-BUTT POOP!!!! majority, I don't see any reason why the anti-BUTT POOP!!!! crowd should be dictating some new and unprecedented policy. --Mn-z 00:07, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it was wrong what TKF did, and I certainly don't think he should de-op Socky. But I still like TKF, he's always been one of my favorite admins. I don't personally believe we made a mistake 'cratting TKF. However, if he does end up de-oping Socky over this, I may reconsider. -- 00:21, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
- I liked TKF too. I say "liked" because that sentiment is currently under scrutiny.
- Actually, TKF has had issues with randomly over-reacting against things for a long time. --Mn-z 03:14, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
03:04, 3 September 2011
- I liked TKF too. I say "liked" because that sentiment is currently under scrutiny.
- Yes, I think it was wrong what TKF did, and I certainly don't think he should de-op Socky. But I still like TKF, he's always been one of my favorite admins. I don't personally believe we made a mistake 'cratting TKF. However, if he does end up de-oping Socky over this, I may reconsider. -- 00:21, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
- The "BUTT POOP!!!! can stay in mainspace but is satellite articles can't" was the compromise position between when Spang gave up on the BUTT POOP!!!! VFD deletion. Since the BUTT POOP!!!! deletion was rigged, and we now have a pro-BUTT POOP!!!! majority, I don't see any reason why the anti-BUTT POOP!!!! crowd should be dictating some new and unprecedented policy. --Mn-z 00:07, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
17:22, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Apparently, TKF has decided to take pre-emptive action and close off this debate once and for all. Frankly, I wasn't seeing this forum go anywhere in an explosive direction so this move strikes me as highly autocratic and authoritarian. TKF's attacks on Socky's performance as an admin (yeah, I saw his talk-page) and his threatening manner in my opinion, is disgusting. If you use an iron fist, it will damn well piss people off and the fact that he's bashing and threatening a fellow admin to defend himself only makes me more angry with him. If this is the way bureaucrats behave with even admins, I think we made a mistake in 'cratting TKF. --Scofield & Dudes 17:48, September 2, 2011 (UTC)
- "protected" lol!. Protected from drama? Hey, you saw the note TKF left. Daddy said you can't have your BUTT POOP!!!! ice cream and banning discussion about said issue is also tantamount to ice cream - definitely not censorship lol!--