| Article: Yes (band)
|
Score: 14.5 line-up changes in the last week
|
| Nominated by:
|
thehallway 19:13, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 14.5
|
- Nommed and written by Thehallway, I didn't expect much and was surprised. Well written, well illustrated, and funny bits throughout. It gives a good history of the band (I don't know much about them or their music), and I want to hear Funnybony's take on the page. But on a once read, well done. (Did it get a pee, so it's legalwise, or maybe needs one if it didn't get it.) Aleister 20:00 23 6 MMX
- It did get a Pee, from the X Japan dude; Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Yes (band) (3rd Submission) although it was actually the 2nd submission not the third, due to some other guy's misunderstanding--thehallway 08:21, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I hope this goes well, for the sake of my reputation. ~
     09:45, Jun 24, 2010 09:45, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak for. Overall well done. I found a few stray lines (example: mathematically proved in intro) to be distracting and wish the prior career as a word joke had pervaded longer. --monika 15:11, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:24, 24 June 2010
#For. Horace Donald Westenchester 22:51, June 24, 2010 (UTC) invalid vote, user banned  Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:35, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- For Because it really is so much better than it used to be and it made me laugh. May leave non-fans wondering what it's about though. --Sog1970 10:12, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes indeed.--86.181.132.174 10:58, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For--94.1.131.69 08:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
 Big Generator prog or die fuckers. -- Sir SF13 (Talk)  GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 15:06 EST 8 July, 2010- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  23:13, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- It's good, and everyone not voting on this is gay. Inebriated 06:19, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Self For Generally against self-voting but, if it tips this in the right direction...--thehallway 12:33, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- In her white lace, you could clearly see the lady sadly looking, saying that she'd take the blame for the crucifixion of her own domain..
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:46, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For--86.24.25.212 20:56, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Tempus fugit.... -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- For. This article has been Close to the Edge for a while now. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:07, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Don't generally abstain but, though I liked this, I really thought it could do with a re-write with non-Yes fans (unlike me) in mind. --Sog1970 22:23, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Although, re-reading it - I may have to vote yes. --Sog1970 22:33, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Marks for comprehension, illustration and overall style but doesn't really reach out to non-Yes fans which would make it a feature in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:57, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think the opening paragraph requires any knowledge of the band to be funny, and that is the part that will be seen on the front page; after which, probably only Yes fans will continue onto the article anyway. Just a thought...--thehallway 11:09, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
--86.24.25.212 20:56, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Big Generator prog or die fuckers. -- 
15:44, July 21, 2010 (UTC)